TABLE 6.
Biomechanical Differences Between Limbs Between the RI and NRI Groupsa
| RI |
NRI |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unplanned CoD | Start | End | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | P Value | Effect Size |
|
| ||||||||
| COM to knee in frontal plane, mm | 76 | 90 | 20.1 ± 42.8 | 3.2 to 37.1 | −6.9 ± 33.3 | −16.0 to 2.0 | .021 | 0.69 |
| Anterior pelvic tilt, deg | 28 | 99 | −4.9 ± 8.8 | −8.4 to −1.5 | 0.3 ± 5.6 | −1.2 to 1.8 | <.001 | 0.69 |
| Trunk to pelvis side flexion, deg | 73 | 100 | −4.9 ± 10.4 | −9.0 to −0.8 | 1.7 ± 8.7 | 1.4 to 2.1 | .029 | 0.68 |
| COM to ankle in frontal plane, mm | 12 | 23 | 38.8 ± 57.4 | 16.1 to 61.6 | 5.0 ± 49.9 | −8.5 to 18.5 | .043 | 0.62 |
| Contralateral pelvic drop, deg | 9 | 36 | 6.9 ± 7.5 | 4.0 to 9.9 | 2.6 ± 6.3 | 0.9 to 4.3 | .030 | 0.61 |
a
CoD, change of direction; COM, center of mass; NRI, no reinjury; RI, reinjury.