Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;22:356. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01900-5

Table 2.

Comparison of ventilatory parameters and arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient between the two groups

Time of measurement Patient parameters RAS group
(n = 25)
LAS group
(n = 20)
P value
Postinduction of Pneumoperitoneum Pplat (cmH2O) 25.0 ± 5.3 22.2 ± 4.6 0.75
Lc (mL/cmH2O) 26.4 ± 6.4 33.0 ± 7.2 0.33
ΔCO2 (mmHg) 7.9 ± 3.9 6.1 ± 4.5 0.36
One-hour into surgery Pplat (cmH2O) 26.2 ± 4.5 20.2 ± 3.5 0.05*
Lc (mL/cmH2O) 28.2 ± 8.5 40.5 ± 13.9 0.01*
ΔCO2 (mmHg) 12.9 ± 4.5 7.4 ± 4.4 0.02*
Two-hour into surgery Pplat at T3 (cmH2O) 25.2 ± 5.7 17.9 ± 3.1 0.01*
Lc at T3 (mL/cmH2O) 26.2 ± 7.8 54.6 ± 16.9 0.01*
ΔCO2 (mmHg) 15.2 ± 4.5 7.7 ± 4.9 0.02*
End of surgery Pplat at T4 (cmH2O) 19.9 ± 5.0 17.0 ± 2.7 0.02*
Lc at T4 (mL/cmH2O) 36.3 ± 9.9 58.2 ± 21.3 0.01*
ΔCO2 (mmHg) 11.0 ± 6.6 7.0 ± 4.6 0.03*

Pplat Plateau pressure, Lc Lung compliance, ΔCO2 Arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient