Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;17:420. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02570-9

Table 2.

Descriptive summary table of selected studies (n = 27)

Author Country MSA† Tested Study sample (n) Mean age (year) Type of IIM studied Diagnostic approach/diagnostic criteria used Mean delay (months) Mean delay SD (months)
Retrospective cohort studies
Baccaro et al. [26] Brazil Yes 55 Not reported ASS Criteria proposed by Connors et al. and Cavagna et al. [51, 52] 29 8.99
Cobo-Ibanez et al. [25] Spain Yes 478 47.7 All types of IIM Peter and Bohan’s criteria 3.48 7.85
Triplett et al. [41] United States Yes 67 Not reported NM Biopsy and electromyography 8.5 28.04
Time series with comparison group
Sayers et al. [21] United States No 32 61 IBM Peter and Bohan’s criteria 34 24.7
Analytical cross-sectional studies or time series
Cavagna et al. [18] Multi-national Yes 44 53.5 ASS Clinical characteristics and positive anti Jo-1 5 6.51
Kazamel et al. [24] United States No 51 Not reported IBM Grigg's pathological criteria [53] 74.4 75.67
Mathiesen et al. [15] Denmark No 57 Not reported JDM Peter and Bohan’s criteria 8 1.6
Pijnenburg et al. [37] France No 40 48.2 All types of IIM ENMC criteria 16.4 4.5
Wargula et al. [20] United States No 59 7.9 JDM Peter and Bohan’s criteria 5.3 5.2
Williams et al. [19] Australia No 13 68 All types of IIM Serum creatinine kinase level, electromyography, and biopsy 55 53.49
Non-comparative studies (descriptive cross-sectional studies, survey and prevalence or incidence studies)
Badrising et al. [16] The Netherlands No 76 Not reported IBM ENMC criteria of 1997 96 71.24
Da Silva et al. [29] United States No 232 Not reported DM Not reported 15.5 46.61
Dobloug et al. [9] Norway Yes 100 Not reported IBM ENMC criteria of 1997 or 2011 67.2 60
Felice et al. [17] United States No 35 70 IBM Definite or possible IBM as proposed by Griggs et al. [53] 68.4 68.47
Lynn et al. [14] New Zealand No 6 Not reported IBM Peter and Bohan’s criteria/Mastaglia and Phillips [54] 43.2 10.3
Needham et al. [23] Australia No 57 Not reported IBM Needham and Mastaglia’s criteria [55] 62.4 39.24
Paltiel et al. [36] Multi-national No 280 70.4 IBM Not reported 56.4 Not reported
Phillips et al. [22] Australia No 17 Not reported IBM Grigg's pathological criteria [53] 52.8 26.72
Rotar et al. [38] Slovenia No 79 Not reported All types of IIM Records of biopsy 6.66 6.77
Non-comparative studies (Case reports)
De Langhe et al. [31] Belgium Yes 1 44 ASS Clinical characteristics and presence of antisynthetase antibodies 48 Not calculatable
Devi et al. [32] India Yes 1 35 ASS Not reported 0 Not calculatable
Dickison et al. [33] United States Yes 1 31 DM Clinical characteristics and biopsy 120 Not calculatable
Herath et al. [28] Sri Lanka Yes 1 53 DM Peter and Bohan’s criteria 5 Not calculatable
Hom et al. [34] United States No 1 58 IBM Biopsy 60 Not calculatable
Kucuksen et al. [27] Turkey No 1 63 IBM Biopsy 60 Not calculatable
Munshi et al. [35] UK No 1 81 IBM Biopsy 36 Not calculatable
Non comparative studies (Case series)
Chilingaryan et al. [30] United States No 20 67.8 IBM Not reported 70 54.8

MSA- myositis specific antibody test

SD- Standard deviation