Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb 29;91:105970. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105970

Table 3.

RAPICE Informed Implementation Process Assessment 111116

RE-AIM Domain Study Quantitative Assessment Previously described implementation barriers for RAPICE assessment RAPICE participant observation questions Potential Policy Summit Questions/ Themes Derived from RAPICE
Reach • n enrolled divided by N in target population • Prior studies, describe patients who prefer not to have care coordinated • What factors explain site Reach variations?
• What are the reasons patients opt out of the trial?
• What are the barriers to enrolling patients?
• Does Reach/breadth of applicability/ of the intervention warrant organizational, regional or national policy requirements?
Effectiveness • Comparison of Intervention vs Control outcomes • Lack of patient engagement
• Lack of ability of team to implement intervention elements
• What factors explain variations in effectiveness across sites? • Are there policy changes that occurred during the study that introduced variability in the intervention delivery?
• Do these policy changes differentially impact control versus intervention conditions?
Adoption • % Provider and/or clinical service participation • Negative staff attitudes toward system change
• Lack of staff/peers with adequate skills to intervention
• What impacts provider participation?
• What impacts staff/peer baseline aptitudes and skill acquisition?
• Will there be sites that spontaneously adopt the intervention without policy requirements?
• What characterizes these innovator/early adopter sites?
Implementation • Documentation of intervention adaptations across sites
• Quantification of provider and site variability in the use of collaborative care or care transition CPT codes
• Implementation of intervention strains existing resources
• Lack of access related to adequate provider CC supervision and support
• What were the barriers to implementation of the intervention
• What was the nature of the adaptations to the intervention that occurred over time?
• Why did adaptations to the intervention occur?
• What organizational, regional and national policies might assist with site implementation of the intervention?
Maintenance • Maintenance of intervention as delivered in the investigation (Yes/No)
• If only partially maintained quantification of adaptations to the intervention
• Lack of ongoing funding as a barrier to sustainability • What are modifications made by providers after the study?
• In what form will the components of the intervention be sustained?
• What are the barriers to maintaining the peer intervention program?
• What policy levers such as health care system mandates or CPT code availability might facilitate site/ organizational maintenance of the intervention?