Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;17(11):e0277531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277531

Table 2. Comparison of upward and downward crossings in the three comparison datasets.

Model Parameter Link Function Data Set Downward Crossings Upward Crossings
Estimate (95% CI) Tukey Group2 Estimate (95% CI) Tukey Group2
Mu (mean for non-zero values) Log Research Colony 0.393 (0.323, 0.464) b 0.447 (0.352, 0.541) ab
Overweight Subset 0.0624 (-0.303, 0.428) a 0.972 (0.746, 1.20) a
Underweight Subset 0.723 (0.298, 1.15) b 0.155 (-0.382, 0.691) b
Sigma (coefficient of variation for non-zero values) Log Research Colony -0.435 (-0.507, 0.363) a -0.169 (-0.241, -0.0972) b
Overweight Subset 0.0808 (-0.143, 0.304) a 0.200 (-0.376, -0.0248) a
Underweight Subset -1.20 (-2.17, -0.240) a -0.828 (-1.65, -0.00601) b
Nu (probability of a zero value) Logit Research Colony -2.88 (-3.35, -2.41) a -2.07 (-2.40, -1.73) b
Overweight Subset 0.231 (-0.559, 1.020) a -2.66 (-3.65, -1.67) a
Underweight Subset -1.10 (-3.91, 1.71) a -11.2 (-206, 184) ab

1 Values of coefficients (with 95%-CI) for the zero-adjusted gamma model fitted to the number of upward and downward crossings in each of the three comparison datasets, together with p-values. The three parameters of the zero-adjusted model correspond to the probability of obtaining a zero value (Nu), the mean of the distribution for non-zero values (Mu) and the coefficient of variation for non-zero values (Sigma).

2 Tukey groups indicate whether differences exist between groups for a parameter within a model; groups with different letters are significantly different at the 5% significance level.