Abstract
Telomerase activity is the principal telomere maintenance mechanism in human cancers, however 15% of cancers utilise a recombination-based mechanism referred to as alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) that leads to long and heterogenous telomere length distributions. Loss-of-function mutations in the Alpha Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-Linked (ATRX) gene are frequently found in ALT cancers. Here, we demonstrate that the loss of ATRX, coupled with telomere dysfunction during crisis, is sufficient to initiate activation of the ALT pathway and that it confers replicative immortality in human fibroblasts. Additionally, loss of ATRX combined with a telomere-driven crisis in HCT116 epithelial cancer cells led to the initiation of an ALT-like pathway. In these cells, a rapid and precise telomeric elongation and the induction of C-circles was observed; however, this process was transient and the telomeres ultimately continued to erode such that the cells either died or the escape from crisis was associated with telomerase activation. In both of these instances, telomere sequencing revealed that all alleles, irrespective of whether they were elongated, were enriched in variant repeat types, that appeared to be cell-line specific. Thus, our data show that the loss of ATRX combined with telomere dysfunction during crisis induces the ALT pathway in fibroblasts and enables a transient activation of ALT in epithelial cells.
Author summary
Telomeres are nucleoprotein structures that cap the ends of linear chromosomes, they are essential for chromosomal stability, but gradually shorten with ongoing cell division. The loss of telomeric DNA ultimately leads to the loss of the end capping function, the induction of widespread genomic instability and cellular crisis. This period of crisis leads to the acquisition of telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM) that are required to confer replicative immortality in cancer cells. The majority of tumour types use telomerase as their TMM, but a significant subset of cancers utilise the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway. Here we show that, in the absence of the Alpha Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-Linked (ATRX) gene, fibroblast cells, that very rarely escape crisis, can efficiently escape crisis having induced the ALT pathway. In contrast, epithelial cells that escape crisis having activated telomerase, are restricted by the absence of ATRX, but can induce a transient ALT-like activity in a small proportion of cells. Our data point to an important role of ATRX in conferring telomere stability and restricting clonal evolution during a telomere-driven crisis in cells of a mesenchymal origin.
Introduction
Telomeres are repetitive DNA:protein elements that protect the ends of linear chromosomes and prevent their recognition as double-stranded DNA breaks [1]. As a consequence of the “end-replication problem”, telomeres shorten with every successive cell cycle and such shortening ultimately limits the proliferative capacity of cells, by eliciting a TP53-dependent G1/S cell cycle arrest that acts as a stringent tumour suppressive mechanism [2]. In the absence of a functional cell-cycle arrest, continued cell division and telomere erosion ultimately result in a period of telomere dysfunction, referred to as “crisis” [3]. Telomere dysfunction during crisis leads to large-scale genomic rearrangements from which cells can escape by activating a telomere maintenance mechanism (TMM) that rescues cell viability but drives clonal evolution and tumour progression [4, 5]. The majority of malignancies, as well as stem cells, germ cells and single-celled organisms, almost exclusively utilise the enzyme complex telomerase as their primary TMM [6, 7]. However, 15% of malignancies, predominantly those of mesenchymal origin [8], do not express telomerase, but instead maintain their telomeres via the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) mechanism [9,10].
ALT was originally characterised by extreme telomere length heterogeneity and an absence of telomerase activity [11]. Subsequently, ALT-associated promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) nuclear bodies (APBs) were identified that contain telomeric repeat DNA and the telomere binding proteins telomere repeat factors 1 and 2 (TRF1 and TRF2), associated with the PML protein [12]. APBs also contain components of the homologous recombination machinery [13,14] and associate with chromosome ends [15] implicating these factors and structures in the underlying mechanisms of ALT. Indeed, specifically-tagged telomeres were shown to be copied onto different chromosome ends in ALT cells [16], supporting a role for recombination in ALT. Moreover, ALT can be suppressed by the abrogation of the key recombination complex, Mre11:Rad50:Nbs1 (MRN) [17]. Finally, certain characteristics of the ALT phenotype are consistent with recombination-mediated mechanisms for telomere elongation including Break Induced Replication (BIR), rolling circle amplification and unequal sister chromatid exchange [18,19].
More recent work has uncovered a strong correlation between malignancies exhibiting the ALT phenotype and mutations in the Alpha Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-Linked (ATRX) gene [20,21]. ATRX is a chaperone for histone H3.3, and along with Death Domain Associated Protein (DAXX), is responsible for H3.3’s replication-independent incorporation into the genome [22,23]. Specifically, H3.3 deposition into telomeric regions seems to be altered in ALT cells and, correspondingly, telomeric chromatin dynamics are altered [23–26]. How ATRX might contribute to the onset of ALT and why ALT appears to occur primarily in cells of mesenchymal origin is unclear [27]. The loss of ATRX, however, co-segregates with the ALT phenotype in cell fusion experiments [28]. Additionally, the frequency of ALT immortalisation events increases with the shRNA knock-down of ATRX in human fibroblasts [29,30]. Lastly, ectopic re-expression of ATRX in ALT cells diminishes their ALT activity [30,31].
In order to gain further insights into the mechanism of ALT, we have examined the earliest stages of telomeric elongation in the absence of ATRX during a telomere crisis in primary human fibroblasts and epithelial cancer cells. The absence of ATRX enabled the successful escape from crisis in fibroblasts, of mesenchymal origin, by the initiation of the ALT mechanism, whilst it compromised the ability of non-mesenchymal epithelial cells to escape crisis. However, epithelial cells in crisis exhibited manifestations of the ALT phenotype including the presence of C-circles, which were observed irrespective of whether they were capable of escaping crisis. Intriguingly, a sub-set of cells displayed specific telomeric elongation events, whereby the shortest telomeric alleles were subjected to elongation to chromosome-specific telomere lengths. Despite the presence of C-circles, this “ALT-like” telomeric elongation was not maintained, with elongated alleles ultimately being subjected to end-replication losses. Thus, the loss of ATRX combined with telomere dysfunction during crisis induces an ALT pathway, which confers replicative immortality in fibroblasts, but is transient in HCT116 epithelial cells. We also show an increase in non-canonical variant repeats in ALT telomeres compared to non-ALT controls.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
HCA2HPVE6E7 skin fibroblasts were provided by James Smith, Houston, US. They were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin and 4 μg/ml G418. Cells were cultured in T75 flasks and passaged every 7 days.
MRC5HPVE6E7 lung fibroblasts were obtained from the Coriell Institute cell repository [32]. They were cultured in MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 4 μg/ml G418, 1x NEAA, 3 mM NaOH and 0.2% NaHCO3. Cells were cultured in T75 flasks and passaged every 7 days.
HCT116ATRX-/0 cells [30] were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin and 4 μg/ml G418. Cells were cultured in T25 flasks and passaged every 7 days.
At each passage, samples were collected for cell counts to track population doublings (PDs), and for DNA and protein extractions.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
The ATRX gene was targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in HCA2HPVE6E7 and MRC5HPVE6E7 cells [30]. The ATRX target sequence, 5′-GTTTCTGTCGGTCGCCTCAA-3′, was used as the guide RNA to target exon 9 of the ATRX gene and ligated into a pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP plasmid (Addgene #48138) using Bbs1 restriction enzyme cut sites. 24 hr after nucleofection, cells were sorted according to GFP intensity by flow cytometry and plated for single-cell cloning.
Lentiviral transfection
Retroviral transfections were used to transfect HCT116ATRX-/0 cells with a dominant negative-hTERT (DN-hTERT) cassette to abrogate telomerase activity. Recombinant retroviruses containing a pBABE-puro vector (Addgene) encoding a DN-hTERT and puromycin selection genes were grown using ΨCRIP cells, gifted by Richard Mulligan (Whitehead Institute, Cambridge) [33]. Cells that had successfully integrated the vector were selected in puromycin 72 hr after addition of the retrovirus to the cells (2.5 μg/ml; Calbiochem) and medium containing puromycin was subsequently used for the culturing of these cells. Expanded cells were ultimately plated for single-cell cloning.
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted using standard RNase A, Proteinase K and phenol:chloroform methods, [34] ethanol precipitated, washed in 70% ethanol, air-dried, resuspended in 50 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl and quantified in triplicate using Hoechst fluorometry (Bio-Rad). A working stock of 20 μl at a concentration of 10 ng/μl was made for each sample.
STELA
Single telomere length analysis (STELA) was undertaken as described [35]. Two primers were used to amplify specific telomeres in the HCA2 model: XpYpE2 and 17p6. Three primers were used to amplify specific telomeres in the MRC5 model: XpYpE2, XpYpAT and XpYpGC. Six primers were used to amplify specific telomeres in the HCT116 model: XpYpC, 5p5, 7qK1, 8q2, 9p2 and 17pseq1rev. The PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 20 s; 59°C (5p5, 17pseq1rev and 17p6), 61°C (9p2), 65°C (7qK1, 8q2, XpYpC, XpYpE2, XpYpAT and XpYpGC) for 30 s; 68°C for 8 min for 22 cycles. DNA fragments were resolved with 0.5% TAE agarose gel electrophoresis and detected by Southern hybridisation at 55°C overnight with a 32P radiolabelled telomere repeat (TTAGGG)n-containing probe together with probes to detect the 1 kb and 2.5 kb markers. The blots were washed four times at 55°C with 0.1% SDS and 0.1X SSC, dried, exposed to a phosphor screen and scanned with a Typhoon FLA 9500 phosphoimager (GE Healthcare) and analysed using ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare).
Fusion PCR
Fusion PCR was undertaken as described [36]. Three primers were used to amplify inter- and intra- allelic fusion events in the HCA2 model: 17p6, 21q1 and XpYpM. The PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 20 s; 62°C for 30 s; and 68°C for 8 min and repeated for 25 cycles. DNA fragments were resolved with 0.5% TAE agarose gel electrophoresis and detected by Southern hybridisation at 55°C overnight with a 32P radiolabelled chromosome-specific (17p, 21q and XpYp) probe together with probes to detect the 1 kb and 2.5 kb markers. The blots were then washed four times at 55°C with 0.1% SDS and 0.1X SSC, dried, exposed to a phosphor screen and scanned with a Typhoon FLA 9500 phosphoimager (GE Healthcare) and analysed using ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare).
C-circle assay
For detecting C-circles, 20 ng of genomic DNA was incubated with 7.5 U of φ29 DNA polymerase, 1 mM dATP, dGTP and dTTP, 0.2 mg/mL BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 and 1X φ29 buffer for 8 hr at 30°C as described [37]. The samples were then denatured and slot blotted onto a positively-charged hybridisation membrane (Hybond XL; GE Healthcare). The membranes were pre-hybridised in Church’s buffer (1% (w/v) BSA; 1 mM EDTA; 0.5 M phosphate buffer and 7% (w/v) SDS) and hybridised overnight at 55°C with a 32P radiolabelled telomere repeat (TTAGGG)n probe. The membranes were then washed, dried, exposed, scanned and quantitated as described above.
TRAP assay
Telomerase activity in the HCT116 cell line was quantified using the TRAPeze XL telomerase detection kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Millipore). Protein was extracted using CHAPS lysis buffer. Protein concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry and a working stock of 30 μl at 100 ng/μl was prepared for each sample to be amplified by PCR. The excitation and emission state wavelengths for fluorescein (485 nm and 535 nm, respectively) and sulforhodamine (585 nm and 620 nm, respectively) were measured on a Cytation3 plate reader (BioTek). All subsequent calculations were done in GraphPad Prism 5 and telomerase activity was expressed as Total Product Generated (TPG).
Telomerase activity in the HCA2 and MRC5 cell lines was quantified as described [38]. Following protein extraction and quantification as described above, 500 ng of protein was incubated with 1X TRAP buffer (2X stock: 40 mM Tris HCl pH 8; 3 mM MgCl2; 126 mM KCl; 0.01% Tween 20; 2 mM EGTA; 0.2 mg/ml BSA; 0.1 mM dNTPs); 0.36 μM TS primer; 1 μl primer mix (stock 0.10 μM ACX primer; 0.19 μM NT primer; and 0.0025 pM TSNT internal control primer: 5′-AATCCGTCGAGCAGAGTTAAAAGGCCGAGAAGCGAT-3′); 0.4X Titanium Taq polymerase (Clontech); and ddH2O to make up 50 μl. Reactions were processed using a Tetrad thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) at the following conditions: 25°C for 40 min; 95°C for 5 min for 1 cycle; 95°C for 30 s; 52°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 45 s for 29 cycles followed by 72°C for 10 min for 1 cycle. 10 μl of 6X Ficoll gel loading solution (5% bromophenol blue; 5% xylene; and 15% Ficoll) were added to each reaction. TRAP PCR products were resolved on acrylamide gels (12.5% acrylamide 19:1; 0.06% APS; 0.125% TEMED; and 0.6X Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE)). Gels were electrophoresed in 1X TBE (400 ml of dH2O and 100 ml of 5X TBE stock: 0.45 M Tris; 0.45 M boric acid; and 10 mM EDTA pH 8) for 1 to 2 hrs at 100 V. To visualise telomerase activity, gels were incubated in 1:10,000 SYBR-gold for 10 min on a rocker at room temperature. Gels were then scanned using the typhoon FLA 9500 scanner using the SYBR-Gold filter (473 nm laser wavelength; 200 micron pixel size).
Oligonucleotides
Telorette2; 5′-TGCTCCGTGCATCTGGCATCTAACCCT-3′
Teltail; 5′-TGCTCCGTGCATCTGGCAT-3′
5p5; 5′-GGAGCAGCATTCTCTTCACCACAG-3′
7qK1; 5′-GGGCACTGCCTCGCTTTGA-3′
9p2; 5′-CACATTCCTCATGTGCTTACG-3′
17pseq1rev; 5′-GAATCCACGGATTGCTTTGTGTAC-3′
17p6; 5′-GGCTGAACTATAGCCTCTGC-3′
21q1; 5′-CTTGGTGTCGAGAGAGGTAG-3′
XpYpC; 5′-CAGGGACCGGGACAAATAGAC-3′
XpYpE2; 5′-TTGTCTCAGGGTCCTAGTG-3′
XpYp-427G/415C; 5′-GGTTATCGACCAGGTGCTCC-3′
XpYp-427A/415T; 5′-GGTTATCAACCAGGTGCTCT-3′
XpYpM; 5′-ACCAGGTTTTCCAGTGTGTT-3′
Whole genome sequencing
27 HCT116 DNA samples (a combination of ALT-positive and telomerase-positive clones) were whole genome sequenced using the BGISEQ-500 platform, providing paired end (2X 100 bps) sequencing with a 15X coverage. A minimum of 20 μl at a concentration of 1 μg per sample was assayed. The QC, library preparation, sequencing and data filtering were carried out by BGI. Sequence mapping and analysis were carried out as described [39].
PacBio SMRT sequencing analysis—generation of sequencing samples
To generate PCR amplicons to be sequenced, specific chromosome ends were amplified using STELA. A minimum of 500 ng of DNA were required for PacBio sequencing and therefore 1,600 reactions were generated for each sample. To amplify multiple telomeres in one reaction, multiple primers were added to the master mix (XpYpC, 7qK1 and 17pseq1rev for HCT116 samples; XpYpE2 and 17p6 for HCA2 samples; and XpYpE2 and 17pseq1rev for the U2OS sample) adjusting the volume of ddH2O accordingly to limit the amount of input genomic DNA for optimal sequencing. The reactions were processed using a Tetrad thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) at the following conditions: 94°C for 20 s; 63°C for 30 s; and 68°C for 8 min for 24 cycles. Following PCR amplification, sample reactions were pooled together and concentrated using an ISS110 Speedvac system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to evaporate excess water using a vacuum. All samples were then purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Samples were then processed for PacBio library preparations.
PacBio SMRT sequencing analysis—data processing
The raw reads were filtered to retain only reads with a sub-telomere primer at one end and a telorette primer at the other end. This was accomplished by aligning the reads using Edlib. Then, all sequences were labelled using a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to highlight and dissociate telomere repeat arrays, sub-telomere sequences and insertions. Sequences were broken down into 6 bp kmers and given scores upon comparison to the canonical telomere repeat TTAGGG allowing an edit distance of 2 bps. The scores were as follows: 0 for background sequence (sub-telomere and insertions); 1 for forward strand telomere repeats (CCCTAA); and 2 for reverse strand telomere repeats (TTAGGG). Therefore, variant repeats with a maximum of 2 bp substitutions compared to TTAGGG were classed as telomere sequence. To clean the data further, subsequent filtering steps were added to the pipeline, which were aimed at removing sequencing and PCR artefacts generated during the process. By this means, the following classes of reads were removed from the analysis: unexpected non-sub-telomeric sequences amplified by low homology with primers; STELA products that appeared to have undergone primer swapping; products that did not have a detectable sub-telomere sequence; and concatemers of STELA products. All of the retained sequences were then compiled into an Excel spreadsheet for manual curation and analysis. The spreadsheet included the sub-telomere length, trimmed telomere length as well as the extension lengths and sequences amongst other features. More detail of the methods used can be found in S1 Methods.
Results
The loss of ATRX induces crisis survival through ALT in primary human fibroblasts
We examined telomere dynamics during crisis in the absence of ATRX and queried whether this impacts the ability of mesenchymal cells to achieve replicative immortality. Telomere crisis was initiated in two primary fibroblast cell lines, HCA2 skin fibroblasts and MRC5 lung fibroblasts, following infection with amphotropic retroviral vectors encoding HPV16 E6 and E7 to abrogate TP53 and retinoblastoma (Rb). Approximately 20 to 30 population doublings (PDs) prior to the onset of crisis, an ATRX-targeted Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeat/CRISPR-associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) vector was used to functionally inactivate the ATRX gene [30]. Following transfection with the ATRX CRISPR/Cas9 vector, single-cell clones were isolated and monitored as they transited through crisis (Figs 1A and 1B and S1A and S1B). A total of 6 and 9 clones survived crisis for the HCA2 and MRC5 cell lines respectively (11.5% and 7.1% survival rate, n = 52 and n = 127 respectively). ATRX protein expression was monitored by Western blot analysis to establish the effects of the CRISPR vector on cell survival. Strikingly, clones that retained ATRX protein expression failed to escape crisis, whilst a complete loss of the ATRX protein resulted in replicative immortality in both cell lines (Figs 1C and 1D and S1C). The status of the ATRX gene was sequence verified in two randomly selected clones: clone 10 and clone 18, which confirmed that a clone (clone 10) that did not escape, expressed wild-type ATRX (likely due to incomplete cutting by CRISPR) whereas a clone that did escape (clone 18), did not express ATRX due to a -2 bp frameshift (S2 Fig).
The immortalisation was dependent upon the loss of ATRX expression as, consistent with numerous previous observations [35,40], HCA2HPVE6E7 control clones (n = 6), which express a WT ATRX failed to escape crisis and died after a prolonged period of crisis (S3 Fig). In conclusion, it appeared as if even low-level residual ATRX activity hindered the ability of cells to escape crisis whereas a complete loss of ATRX correlated with successful long-term survival (i.e., immortalisation) in primary human fibroblasts (Figs 1A–1D and S1A–1C)).
Telomere dynamics were analysed at the XpYp and 17p chromosome ends using STELA (Figs 1E and 1F and S1D and S1E; and S4). Consistent with previous observations in clonal WT fibroblast cultures [35,41], homogeneous allelic telomere-length distributions were observed in clones that failed to escape crisis, as well as control clones, with all telomeric alleles exhibiting a gradual loss of telomere length as cells approached crisis (Figs 1E and S1D and S4). In stark contrast, the clones that escaped crisis upon loss of ATRX displayed heterogeneous telomere lengths, with no distinguishable allelic telomere length distributions, even at the earliest sampling points (Figs 1F and S1E and S5). MRC5 cells exhibit telomere-adjacent sequence polymorphisms that allow for allele-specific (GC or AT) STELA at the XpYp telomere [41]. MRC5 clones 121, 9 and 46 that escaped crisis in the absence of ATRX, displayed heterogeneous telomere-length distributions at both alleles (S1E and S5B Figs), in contrast to clone 1, that failed to escape crisis and maintained distinct homogeneous allelic distributions (S1D Figs). Therefore, the loss of ATRX induces telomere length heterogeneity during crisis at both alleles, irrespective of their length prior to crisis, and this heterogeneity is maintained following their escape from crisis, suggesting that these cells may have induced an ALT-like phenotype.
Telomere fusion analysis of HCA2 clones revealed that fusion events could readily be detected, even at the earliest sampling points, indicating that these cells had entered a telomere crisis and thus the generation of telomere length heterogeneity occurs within the period of crisis (S6 Fig). These data also demonstrate that short telomeres during crisis, in the absence of ATRX, are subjected to repair activity, as observed in wild-type cells undergoing crisis [33,35]. Moreover, as the cells escaped crisis, the frequency of fusion events was reduced in all but one clone (S6B Fig; clone 49) and the analysis of post-crisis ALT+ U2OS cells revealed no detectable telomere fusion events despite these cells exhibiting extreme telomere length heterogeneity. These data indicate that the telomere fusions occur early in crisis and that this is likely necessary (clones 18, 21, 27, 28 and 49) but not sufficient (clone 1) for the establishment of an ALT phenotype. Moreover, the data indicate that once ALT is established, it is sufficient to prevent the subsequent fusion of short telomeres even though they are relatively abundant.
One of the hallmarks of ALT is the presence of extrachromosomal partially single-stranded DNA, referred to as C-circles [37]. We used a C-circle assay to establish whether the telomere elongation events observed during crisis may coincide with the presence of C-circles and thus be consistent with ALT activity [37]. C-circles were absent in the parental HCA2 and MRC5 cells, but increased during the escape from crisis in all HCA2HPVE6E7;ATRX-/o and MRC5HPVE6E7;ATRX-/o clones to levels greater than that observed in the ALT-positive control U2OS (Figs 1G, S1F and S7). In contrast, clones that failed to escape crisis were negative for C-circles. In addition, telomerase activity was not detected in any of the fibroblast clones following immortalisation, irrespective of whether they subsequently escaped crisis or not (S8 Fig). Taken together these data reveal a key role for ATRX in suppressing the ability of fibroblast cells to escape a telomere-driven crisis by normally inhibiting telomeric elongation events during crisis. Moreover, the induction of ALT activity is sufficient to ultimately confer functional telomeres that, subsequent to crisis survival, are no longer subjected to fusion.
ATRX facilitates the escape from a telomere-driven crisis in epithelial cancer cells
We have previously generated ATRX-null telomerase-positive human HCT116 colorectal epithelial cancer cells using both recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting [30]. We demonstrated that the genetic deletion of ATRX alone did not lead to the activation of the ALT phenotype even when these cells were forced through crisis; these cells were negative for C-circles, did not display heterogenous telomere length profiles and continued to express telomerase [30]. Thus, the loss of ATRX had a different outcome for the non-mesenchymal HCT116 epithelial cells than it did for the mesenchymal HCA2 and MRC5 fibroblast cell lines. To assess whether the loss of ATRX combined with telomere dysfunction during crisis could at least initiate the ALT mechanism for survival we transfected HCT116ATRX-/o with a dominant-negative hTERT (DN-hTERT) construct [42] to abrogate telomerase activity and induce a telomere-driven crisis. A total of 149 single cell clones were picked from four separate DN-hTERT transfections; clones were continuously passaged in culture and were monitored for changes in growth rate and morphology. All the clones entered a period of crisis, defined as a slowing in the rate of expansion of the culture (Fig 2A) and a change in morphology from small, actively-dividing cells to large, multi-nucleated cells (S9 Fig). Unlike WT HCT116DN-hTERT clones, in which 100% of clones (11 of 11) rapidly escaped crisis after having re-established telomerase activity [33], only 33 out of 149 (22%) of the HCT116ATRX-/o:DN-hTERT clones escaped a telomere-driven crisis and appeared to gain replicative immortality (Fig 2A). These 33 clones, of which 29 appeared to be telomerase positive and 4 ALT, were cultured until a normal growth rate had resumed after which the cultures were terminated. The remaining 116 clones entered crisis and died, including 38 clones that entered crisis prior to a sample being taken (summarised in S1 Table). No evidence of crisis was observed in HCT116ATRX-/o:Puro control clones (n = 12) expressing the puromycin drug resistance selection cassette (i.e., without DN-hTERT) only (S10 Fig). Thus, the absence of ATRX compromised the ability of HCT116 epithelial cells to escape crisis (where only 22% of the ATRX-null clones escaped crisis)—a phenotype diametrically opposed to the one observed in fibroblast cells, where 100% of the surviving clones were ATRX-null.
Specific telomeric elongation events and C-circles consistent with ALT activity in the absence of ATRX
We monitored the telomere dynamics of HCT116ATRX-/0:DN-hTERT clones undergoing crisis in culture. Telomere length profiles at the 17p and XpYp chromosome ends were obtained using STELA at sampling points both pre- and post-crisis for 82 clones. The majority of clones (78 clones: 95%) exhibited telomere erosion prior to crisis (mean of 60 bps/PD at 17p and 80 bps/PD at XpYp), consistent with the abrogation of telomerase activity following the expression of DN-hTERT. Strikingly, three clones displayed telomere erosion followed by, at the point of crisis, an abrupt elongation event at both chromosome ends analysed (mean of elongated allele: 6.68 kb at 17p and 1.87 kb at XpYp) (Fig 2B and 2C, clones 2, 3 and 4). A fourth clone exhibited a similar sized elongation event at the XpYp chromosome end (1.07 kb), but not at 17p (S11 Fig). The bimodal distributions observed at the 17p chromosome end before crisis were consistent with allelic telomere length variation, we thus considered that the elongated telomeres arose from the extension of a single allele. However, it was also possible that the bimodal distributions arose from subsets of cells with distinct telomere length profiles with the extension events occurring in a specific subset of cells and were thus not allelic. To test this, we subcloned clone 3 at the point of crisis and examined the telomere length distributions. All the surviving subclones displayed bi-modal telomere length distributions, consistent with allele-specific telomeric elongation (S12 Fig). Interestingly, a single subclone died (subclone 2) at PD17 whilst displaying no telomere extension events (S12 Fig).
The clones that failed to escape crisis, showed telomere erosion prior to crisis, but no change in telomere length at crisis (Figs 2B and 2C, clones 1 and 8 and S13). HCT116ATRX-/o:Puro control clones displayed no significant change in mean telomere length (Fig 2B and 2C). A further 17 clones that escaped crisis, exhibited a change from homogeneous to more heterogeneous telomere-length distributions, whilst clones for which no sample was available pre-crisis (n = 8) also showed similar heterogeneity post-crisis (S14 Fig), these telomere dynamics are consistent with a reactivation of telomerase following the escape from crisis, as described [33].
We next examined the longer-term maintenance of the extended telomeres in the three clones that had exhibited elongation at both chromosome ends studied. These clones were kept in culture for 219 days until they had obtained over 100 PDs and the telomere length profiles were examined at serial sampling points. At the 17p telomere, we observed bi-modal telomere-length distributions pre- and post-crisis consistent with two telomeric alleles [41]. We hypothesised that the short allele, prior to crisis, became elongated to a mean of 6.68 kb (i.e., an extension of 5.40 kb) whilst the longer allele continued to erode (Fig 3A). At the XpYp telomere, a single allele was detected that underwent elongation to a mean of 1.87 kb (i.e., an extension of 1.06 kb) (S15 Fig). Following the initial elongation event, both telomeres continued to erode, with the longer telomeric allele at 17p exhibiting an erosion rate (mean for all 3 clones examined: 83 bps/PD, Fig 3A) that was indistinguishable from that observed in primary cells in the absence of telomerase [41], whilst the shorter 17p telomeric alleles exhibited a slower rate of erosion (mean for all 3 clones examined: 29 bps/PD). The single XpYp telomeric allele was also subject to telomere erosion (mean rate of erosion of 27 bps/PD; S15 Fig). Telomere erosion continued until the cultures upregulated telomerase at PD 59, 60 and 58 in clones 2, 3 and 4, respectively, as determined by the TRAP assay. The restoration of telomerase activity was accompanied by an increase in the heterogeneity of the telomere length distributions resulting in a loss of bimodal distributions and an increase in mean telomere length (Fig 3A and 3B). These telomere dynamics were recapitulated in subclone 11 and were consistent with the action of telomerase preferentially elongating the shorter allele, but not the longer allele (S12 Fig) [36,43].
To assess if the initial elongation event observed was consistent with ALT upregulation, clones were subjected to the C-circle assay. The intensity of the signal was quantified in duplicate and all results were normalised to the HCT116ATRX-/o parental cell line background. The three clones (clones 2, 3 and 4) that displayed elongation at the XpYp and 17p telomeres showed a gradual increase in C-circles from the initial telomere elongation event, although these cells continued to exhibit C-circles during the re-establishment of telomerase activity (Fig 3C). A further 3 clones (32, 48 and 131), for which no telomeric elongation event was observed at the XpYp telomeres, were also strongly positive for C-circles post-crisis, a state which diminished at later PDs (S16A–S16C Fig); these cells also upregulated telomerase activity (S16D Fig). Overall the levels of C-circles was consistently less than that observed in the ALT-positive cell line U2OS and less than that observed in fibroblast cultures (S7 Fig). In summary, the presence of C-circles correlated with the ALT-like telomere elongations observed in clones 2, 3 and 4 but C-circles were also present in clones 32, 48 and 131, which did not elongate. Thus, we concluded that while the presence of C-circles might be necessary for these ALT-like elongations, they aren’t sufficient.
It was clear that in the HCT116ATRX-/o:DN-hTERT system, single telomeric elongation events were not sufficient to confer replicative immortality following the escape from crisis. We therefore considered that other clones that failed to escape crisis may also have shown evidence of telomeric elongation events. On this basis, STELA profiles were obtained at 17p and XpYp for all clones that died and for which samples where available (n = 46). Two clones (108 and 132) exhibited elongation events at the XpYp telomere of 0.74 kb on average, similar to that observed in clones 2, 3, 4 and 147 (S17A Fig). No evidence of telomeric extension was observed at the 17p chromosome end in these two clones, instead the shorter telomeric allele was lost during crisis (S17B Fig). Both these clones were positive for C-circles (S17C and F17D Fig) whilst telomerase activity was undetectable (S17D Fig). Importantly, these data imply that neither C-circle activity, nor single telomeric elongation, is sufficient for these cells to escape a telomere-driven crisis. All HCT116ATRX-/o:DN-hTERT clones that ultimately obtained replicative immortality did so by regaining telomerase as their principle TMM.
Overall, these data indicate that the combination of the loss of ATRX and telomere dysfunction during crisis is sufficient to initiate an “ALT-like” mechanism in a subset of clones (21% of surviving clones and 16% of clones that died; 19% of total clones). Whilst this rapid telomere elongation and C-circle activity is “ALT-like”, in the HCT116 DN-hTERT model system this is insufficient for the maintenance of ALT activity and telomerase activity is ultimately required for long-term survival.
Chromosome specific elongation
Having observed telomeric elongation events in multiple HCT116ATRX-/o:DN-hTERT clones that appeared to be chromosome specific, with a mean of 5.40 kb added to the shorter allele at 17p and 1.06 kb at the single XpYp allele (Fig 2B and 2C), we investigated whether chromosome-specific telomeric elongation events occurred at other chromosome ends. To address this, we applied STELA at the 5p, 7q, 8q and 9p chromosome ends in clones that showed telomere elongation at both the XpYp and 17p chromosome ends (clones 2, 3 and 4) (Figs 4 and S18). We observed specific elongation events in all three clones at the 5p, 7q and 9p telomeres, with mean extensions to: 3.58 kb (extension of 1.9 kb) at 5p; 3.22 kb (extension of 1.14 kb) at 7q; 1.93 kb (extension of 0.52 kb) at 9p (S18D Fig). In contrast, no extension events were observed at the telomeres at the 8q chromosome end, which were long relative to the other telomeres analysed (6.66 kb) in the parental cell line; instead, this telomere simply eroded as a function of cell division post-crisis. Thus, there appeared to be a lack of unified specificity in the telomere elongation, with 5 of the 6 telomere ends examined demonstrating telomere elongation. With that said, there clearly was a rather profound difference in the amount of telomere elongation associated with each end, ranging from a ~5.5 kb addition at 17p to only ~0.5 kb at 9p. The basis for the variable elongation is not understood, but most chromosome ends appeared affected.
Elongation affects all alleles and arises from multiple independent events
Our STELA data indicated that some HCT116 clones might be ALT-like and that short telomeric alleles were specifically elongated during crisis. To establish if this was the case, and to examine the nature of telomere-specific extensions, we characterised telomeric alleles using PacBio single-molecule real time (SMRT) long-read sequencing of multiplexed STELA amplicons from the 7q, 17p and XpYp telomeres obtained by pooling 1,600 reactions for each sample analysed (HCT116ATRX-/o parental and clone 3; HCA2HPVE6E7 parental and clone 21ATRX-/o; and U2OS). We utilised the hypervariable telomere variant repeat (TVR) patterns within the first 100 base pairs of the telomere repeat array to differentiate telomeric alleles from HCT116, HCA2 and U2OS cells [44–46]. The TVR content was determined for each read to establish any differences in variant repeat distributions between the ALT-like clones and their respective parental controls. We observed an overall increase in TVRs in the ALT-like clone, with a specific enrichment of TTCGGG TVR in the HCT116 clone at all chromosome ends and alleles analysed (S19A Fig), whilst an increase in the TGAGGG TVR was observed in the HCA2 clone analysed that was most apparent at the XpYp chromosome end (S19B Fig). Consistent with previous findings [47], the telomeric alleles in U2OS contained relatively few TVRs being composed predominately of TTAGGG repeats (S19C Fig). These data indicated that the increase in TVR interspersion patterns were specific to each cell clone and consistent with a utilisation of a clone-specific telomeric DNA template.
Examination of the sequence composition of individual telomeric alleles revealed several notable features (Figs 5 and S20). In HCT116 cells, a dramatic increase in TTCGGG variant repeats was observed in all alleles, at each of the three telomeres analysed, irrespective of the length of the elongated allele. In HCA2 cells, an insertion of a characteristic TGAGGG interspersion pattern was observed in XpYp allele 1, with different TVR patterns in XpYp allele 2 and both 17p alleles sequenced. Together these observations indicate that the insertion of TVRs does not lead to specific elongation events, with alleles exhibiting changes in TVR composition in the absence of elongation events. Moreover, each individual telomere sequenced displayed distinct TVR interspersion patterns that disrupted the parental allele at different points with respect to the beginning of the telomere repeat array. These data indicate the occurrence of multiple different mutational events, occurring within different telomeric alleles, with the majority of events resulting in the replacement of distal sequences, leaving the repeat distributions at the beginning of the telomere repeat array intact (Figs 5 and S20). The diversity of TVR distributions within a cell and between cells that escape crisis in the absence of ATRX is consistent with the view that telomeric mutation during crisis occurs multiple times and in multiple independent cells.
Initiation of ALT in HCT116ATRX-/o:DNhTERT is not associated with increased genomic complexity
The transit through a telomere crisis is associated with the induction of increased genomic complexity with distinct topologies observed in the context of specific DNA repair deficiencies [33,39,48]. We therefore examined whether the absence of ATRX modulates genomic complexity in cells that escape crisis and whether this was impacted by the telomeric elongation events observed. We generated whole genome sequence data from HCT116ATRX-/o:DNhTERT clones that exhibited “ALT-like” telomere elongation, sampling the cells pre- and post-crisis. We also analysed clones that showed no evidence of telomere elongation, nor C-circles, but had upregulated telomerase activity during crisis (total n = 30). All HCT116ATRX-/o:DNhTERT clones displayed genome stability prior to crisis, as did all the clones that exhibited transient “ALT-like” activity. Consistent with our previous observations [39], all the HCT116ATRX-/o:DNhTERT clones that had upregulated telomerase showed a higher rate of structural variants, including an example of chromothripsis (S21 Fig). Thus, whilst the initiation of “ALT-like” activity in HCT116ATRX-/o:DNhTERT cells undergoing crisis in the absence of ATRX is associated with rapid, telomere-specific elongation, this did not appear to be accompanied by large-scale genomic copy number changes, or at least no more so than was observed in immortalised clones lacking the “ALT-like” phenotype.
Discussion
A strong link between ATRX and the ALT phenotype in various malignancies and cell culture models has been well established [21,28,30,49]. Whilst there has been a focus on the association of ATRX with such phenotypes or mechanistic contributions to repressing ALT activity, thus far it has only been demonstrated once that the loss ATRX alone is sufficient to induce ALT, and only in specific glioma cell lines [50]. This lack of ALT inducing-activity in ATRX-null cells was surprising particularly given the association of the lack of ATRX expression with ALT cancers. Adding to this complexity was the finding that genetic ablation of another histone H3.3-H4 dimer chaperone, anti-silencing function 1 (ASF-1), readily generated ALT-activity in telomerase-positive cells [51]. Here we show that the loss of ATRX allows primary human fibroblast cultures undergoing a telomere-driven crisis to readily escape and gain replicative immortality, following the establishment of ALT-activity. Importantly, even low-level, residual ATRX activity, is sufficient to prevent these cells from initiating ALT and achieving immortality (Fig 2C). In contrast, the loss of ATRX alone was not sufficient to induce ALT in epithelial cancer cells when experimentally manipulated to undergo a second crisis. Nonetheless, even in these cells, an “ALT-like” phenotype could be initiated, albeit ultimately not stably maintained. These data are consistent with the view, that ATRX is a bona fide ALT inhibitor in the context of telomere dysfunction [31]. Moreover, by demonstrating that there are different immortalisation outcomes depending upon the type of cell in which the loss of ATRX activity occurs, we provide clarity to a literature that was opaque.
ATRX plays an important role in replication fork protection and restart, and its loss leads to an increase in replication fork stalling and collapse [52,53]. Furthermore, ATRX, along with its binding partner DAXX, prevents the accumulation of secondary structures such as R-loops and G quadruplexes, that arise at repetitive regions of the genome (including telomeres), by incorporating histone H3.3 into nucleosomes [54,55]. These secondary structures form a further barrier to the replication fork machinery thereby increasing replication stress, which can be repaired by BIR [54,56]. Somewhat counterintuitively, replication stress is actually required in ALT cells because the repair induced by BIR leads to telomeric elongation. We therefore propose that the loss of ATRX and the presence of short telomeres during crisis may trigger telomere lengthening via the accumulation of replication stress and the induction of BIR at telomeres [57]. A corollary of this conclusion is that the factors required for replication stress and/or BIR are likely to vary between fibroblasts (more permissive) and epithelial (non-permissive) cells. Our model also postulates that mutations that diminish or inactivate BIR are likely to impede the establishment of ALT; a model that we are currently trying to test. While we believe that differences in BIR is the most likely, and parsimonious, explanation for the cell type and TMM disparities observed in these studies, it should be emphasised that the distinction between fibroblastic and epithelial cell lines we have observed could also be related to the fact that the HCA2 and MRC5 fibroblast cell lines had not, unlike the HCT116 epithelial cell line, undergone a previous transformation event. The impact of a previous transformation event on the ability of a cell to establish a new TMM is unknown, but clearly worth future investigation.
Our data show that the ALT mechanism induces elongation events at multiple chromosome ends only in cells that have entered a telomere-driven crisis. In fibroblasts, telomere lengthening and heterogeneity were observed in all telomeric alleles, whereas in epithelial cancer cells, lengthening appeared to be more specific to the shortest alleles. The underlying mechanism for these differences is not apparent from our data, although, it has recently been shown, through single molecule analysis, that telomere length and content heterogeneity varied according to the sub-telomere studied in a panel of ALT cell lines [58], consistent with chromosome-specific events. However, our study suggests a different possibility; namely that the difference may be a manifestation of different levels of BIR factors/ALT activity given that fibroblasts fully activated the ALT pathway, whereas, the cancer epithelial cells only transiently activated it. In this situation, the extreme telomere length heterogeneity generated following the full activation of the ALT pathway may mask subtler and specific elongation events that may be more apparent at lower levels of activity. Interestingly, our data suggest that these events are chromosome specific, as independent clones exhibited similar elongation events at each telomere in the HCT116 model. We hypothesise that telomeric elongation may be regulated, with a specific and consistent DNA fragment length, consisting of telomere variant repeats derived from telomeric and interstitial telomeric sequences [59] being inserted into the telomere, potentially mediated by a recombination-based mechanism [16,19,60–62] and/or by BIR, which is known to be highly mutagenic. Consistent with recombination-based mechanisms, a recent study has shown the presence of large linear extrachromosomal DNA, alongside the C-circles and short linear tracts already well established as ALT markers, that accounts for 40% of the total telomere signal in U2OS. These DNA structures have the potential to play an active role in telomere maintenance by acting as templates in BIR-mediated lengthening [58].
Alterations in TVR patterns in ALT clones were specific to each cell clone, which is consistent with previous studies investigating the telomere repeat content in ALT-positive cancer samples [63,64]. We therefore hypothesise that a common initiating event is required to seed the clone-specific TVR patterns, forming ALT precursors as described in yeast models [62] that subsequently provide a template to enable elongation of short telomeres by inter-allelic exchanges [16,61]. Interestingly, TVR replacement was also observed both proximally and distally to distinctive conserved TVR patterns (highlighted in red, Fig 5), indicating a possible gene conversion type mechanism that can conserve existing TVR patterns, although this remains to be fully tested. Whilst normal human cells harbour non-canonical variant repeat interspersion patterns within the proximal 2 kb of the telomere repeat array [45], ALT telomeres display TVRs throughout the telomere [65]. It is considered that these enable the anchoring of nuclear receptors such as COUP-TF2, which play a role in the ALT phenotype [65]. We observed a similar interspersion pattern of variant repeats in the fibroblast ALT-like clones. Interestingly, PacBio sequencing of the HCT116 ALT-like clones showed a stark increase in the TTCGGG variant repeat, even at the distal end of the chromosome. The presence of these non-canonical TVRs may reduce the binding of the telomere-associated proteins telomere recognition factors 1 and 2 (TRF1 and TRF2) to the telomere and compromise telomere function. Despite that our data provides some insight in telomere variant repeat pattern content, more remains to be done to elucidate the mechanism of elongation in the context of ALT.
In summary, in fibroblasts, the induction of ALT in the absence of ATRX occurs early in crisis at the point that telomere fusions are detected. This facilitates a rapid and efficient escape from crisis, the abrogation of telomere fusions and genomic stabilisation. We suggest these may represent the types of events that occur during the initiation of ALT-positive tumours. Further understanding of the upregulation of the ALT pathway and the mechanism of elongation is crucial for the development of treatments as well as diagnostic and prognostic tests.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Joanne Morgan, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University for PacBio sequence analysis. We thank members of the Baird and Hendrickson laboratories for help and advice.
Data Availability
Whole genome sequence data and PacBio telomere sequence data have been deposited to SRA (BioProject ID PRJNA796771).
Funding Statement
This work has been supported by Cancer Research UK, A18246/A29202, to DMB, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org, the National Cancer Institute, CA15446, and the National Institutes of Health General Medical Sciences, GM088351 to EAH, https://www.nih.gov. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.O’Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(3):171–81. Epub 2010/02/04. doi: 10.1038/nrm2848 Epub 2010 Feb 3. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2842081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Olovnikov AM. A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1973;41(1):181–90. Epub 1973/09/14. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90198-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wright WE, Shay JW. The two-stage mechanism controlling cellular senescence and immortalization. Exp Gerontol. 1992;27(4):383–9. Epub 1992/07/01. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(92)90069-c . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin TT, Letsolo BT, Jones RE, Rowson J, Pratt G, Hewamana S, et al. Telomere dysfunction and fusion during the progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: evidence for a telomere crisis. Blood. 2010;116(11):1899–907. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-272104 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roger L, Jones RE, Heppel NH, Williams GT, Sampson JR, Baird DM. Extensive telomere erosion in the initiation of colorectal adenomas and its association with chromosomal instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(16):1202–11. Epub 2013/08/07. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt191 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ju Z, Lenhard Rudolph K. Telomere dysfunction and stem cell ageing. Biochimie. 2008;90(1):24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.09.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henson JD, Reddel RR. Assaying and investigating Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres activity in human cells and cancers. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(17):3800–11. Epub 2010/06/15. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.06.009 Epub 2010 Jun 11. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shay JW, Reddel RR, Wright WE. Cancer. Cancer and telomeres—an ALTernative to telomerase. Science. 2012;336(6087):1388–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1222394 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pickett HA, Reddel RR. Molecular mechanisms of activity and derepression of alternative lengthening of telomeres. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(11):875–80. Epub 2015/11/20. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3106 Epub 2015 Nov 4. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bryan TM, Englezou A, Gupta J, Bacchetti S, Reddel RR. Telomere elongation in immortal human cells without detectable telomerase activity. Embo J. 1995;14(17):4240–8. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00098.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yeager TR, Neumann AA, Englezou A, Huschtscha LI, Noble JR, Reddel RR. Telomerase-negative immortalized human cells contain a novel type of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) body. Cancer Research. 1999;59(17):4175–9. PubMed PMID: WOS:000082380200005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nabetani A, Yokoyama O, Ishikawa F. Localization of hRad9, hHus1, hRad1, and hRad17 and caffeine-sensitive DNA replication at the alternative lengthening of telomeres-associated promyelocytic leukemia body. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(24):25849–57. Epub 2004/04/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312652200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stavropoulos DJ, Bradshaw PS, Li X, Pasic I, Truong K, Ikura M, et al. The Bloom syndrome helicase BLM interacts with TRF2 in ALT cells and promotes telomeric DNA synthesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(25):3135–44. Epub 2002/11/22. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.25.3135 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Draskovic I, Arnoult N, Steiner V, Bacchetti S, Lomonte P, Londono-Vallejo A. Probing PML body function in ALT cells reveals spatiotemporal requirements for telomere recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(37):15726–31. Epub 2009/09/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907689106 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2747187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dunham MA, Neumann AA, Fasching CL, Reddel RR. Telomere maintenance by recombination in human cells. Nat Genet. 2000;26(4):447–50. Epub 2000/12/02. doi: 10.1038/82586 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang WQ, Zhong ZH, Henson JD, Neumann AA, Chang AC, Reddel RR. Suppression of alternative lengthening of telomeres by Sp100-mediated sequestration of the MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(7):2708–21. Epub 2005/03/16. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2708-2721.2005 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1061646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cesare AJ, Reddel RR. Alternative lengthening of telomeres: models, mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(5):319–30. Epub 2010/03/31. doi: 10.1038/nrg2763 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang JM, Yadav T, Ouyang J, Lan L, Zou L. Alternative lengthening of telomeres through two distinct break-induced replication pathways. Cell Rep. 2019;26(4):955–68.e3. Epub 2019/01/24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.102 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6366628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lovejoy CA, Li W, Reisenweber S, Thongthip S, Bruno J, de Lange T, et al. Loss of ATRX, genome instability, and an altered DNA damage response are hallmarks of the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002772 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3400581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heaphy CM, de Wilde RF, Jiao Y, Klein AP, Edil BH, Shi C, et al. Altered telomeres in tumors with ATRX and DAXX mutations. Science. 2011;333(6041):425. doi: 10.1126/science.1207313 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wong LH, McGhie JD, Sim M, Anderson MA, Ahn S, Hannan RD, et al. ATRX interacts with H3.3 in maintaining telomere structural integrity in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2010;20(3):351–60. Epub 2010/01/30. gr.101477.109 [pii] doi: 10.1101/gr.101477.109 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2840985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldberg AD, Banaszynski LA, Noh KM, Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, Stadler S, et al. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell. 2010;140(5):678–91. Epub 2010/03/10. S0092-8674(10)00004-8 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ivanauskiene K, Delbarre E, McGhie JD, Kuntziger T, Wong LH, Collas P. The PML-associated protein DEK regulates the balance of H3.3 loading on chromatin and is important for telomere integrity. Genome Res. 2014;24(10):1584–94. doi: 10.1101/gr.173831.114 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4199371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Sullivan RJ, Almouzni G. Assembly of telomeric chromatin to create ALTernative endings. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(11):675–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.07.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Episkopou H, Draskovic I, Van Beneden A, Tilman G, Mattiussi M, Gobin M, et al. Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres is characterized by reduced compaction of telomeric chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(7):4391–405. Epub 2014/02/07. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku114 Epub 2014 Feb 5. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3985679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amorim JP, Santos G, Vinagre J, Soares P. The Role of ATRX in the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) Phenotype. Genes (Basel). 2016;7(9). doi: 10.3390/genes7090066 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5042396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bower K, Napier CE, Cole SL, Dagg RA, Lau LM, Duncan EL, et al. Loss of wild-type ATRX expression in somatic cell hybrids segregates with activation of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50062. Epub 2012/11/28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050062 Epub 2012 Nov 20. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3502299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu Y, Shi G, Zhang L, Li F, Jiang Y, Jiang S, et al. Switch telomerase to ALT mechanism by inducing telomeric DNA damages and dysfunction of ATRX and DAXX. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32280. Epub 2016/09/01. doi: 10.1038/srep32280 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5006076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Napier CE, Huschtscha LI, Harvey A, Bower K, Noble JR, Hendrickson EA, et al. ATRX represses alternative lengthening of telomeres. Oncotarget. 2015;6(18):16543–58. PubMed PMID: WOS:000359012000079. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clynes D, Jelinska C, Xella B, Ayyub H, Scott C, Mitson M, et al. Suppression of the alternative lengthening of telomere pathway by the chromatin remodelling factor ATRX. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7538. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8538 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4501375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jacobs JP, Jones CM, Baille JP. Characteristics of a human diploid cell designated MRC-5. Nature. 1970;227(5254):168–70. doi: 10.1038/227168a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jones RE, Oh S, Grimstead JW, Zimbric J, Roger L, Heppel NH, et al. Escape from Telomere-Driven Crisis Is DNA Ligase III Dependent. Cell reports. 2014;8(4):1063–76. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sambrock J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual. Second ed. New-York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Capper R, Britt-Compton B, Tankimanova M, Rowson J, Letsolo B, Man S, et al. The nature of telomere fusion and a definition of the critical telomere length in human cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21(19):2495–508. doi: 10.1101/gad.439107 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Britt-Compton B, Rowson J, Locke M, Mackenzie I, Kipling D, Baird DM. Structural stability and chromosome-specific telomere length is governed by cis-acting determinants in humans. Human Molecular Genetics. 2006;15(5):725–33. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi486 PubMed PMID: WOS:000235432900006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Henson JD, Cao Y, Huschtscha LI, Chang AC, Au AY, Pickett HA, et al. DNA C-circles are specific and quantifiable markers of alternative-lengthening-of-telomeres activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(12):1181–5. Epub 2009/11/26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1587 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mender I, Shay JW. Telomerase Repeated Amplification Protocol (TRAP). Bio Protoc. 2015;5(22). Epub 2016/05/18. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.1657 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4863463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cleal K, Jones RE, Grimstead JW, Hendrickson EA, Baird DM. Chromothripsis during telomere crisis is independent of NHEJ and consistent with a replicative origin. Genome Res. 2019. Epub 2019/03/16. doi: 10.1101/gr.240705.118 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bond JA, Haughton MF, Rowson JM, Smith PJ, Gire V, Wynford-Thomas D, et al. Control of replicative life span in human cells: barriers to clonal expansion intermediate between M1 senescence and M2 crisis. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(4):3103–14. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.4.3103 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Baird DM, Rowson J, Wynford-Thomas D, Kipling D. Extensive allelic variation and ultrashort telomeres in senescent human cells. Nat Genet. 2003;33(2):203–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1084 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hahn WC, Stewart SA, Brooks MW, York SG, Eaton E, Kurachi A, et al. Inhibition of telomerase limits the growth of human cancer cells. Nat Med. 1999;5(10):1164–70. doi: 10.1038/13495 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chang M, Arneric M, Lingner J. Telomerase repeat addition processivity is increased at critically short telomeres in a Tel1-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2007;21(19):2485–94. doi: 10.1101/gad.1588807 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Allshire RC, Dempster M, Hastie ND. Human telomeres contain at least three types of G-rich repeat distributed non-randomly. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(12):4611–27. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4611 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Baird DM, Jeffreys AJ, Royle NJ. Mechanisms underlying telomere repeat turnover, revealed by hypervariable variant repeat distribution patterns in the human Xp/Yp telomere. Embo J. 1995;14(21):5433–43. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00227.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Baird DM, Coleman J, Rosser ZH, Royle NJ. High levels of sequence polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium at the telomere of 12q: implications for telomere biology and human evolution. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(1):235–50. doi: 10.1086/302721 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Min J, Wright WE, Shay JW. Alternative lengthening of telomeres can be maintained by preferential elongation of lagging strands. Nucleic Acids Res. 452017. p. 2615–28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liddiard K, Ruis B, Takasugi T, Harvey A, Ashelford KE, Hendrickson EA, et al. Sister chromatid telomere fusions, but not NHEJ-mediated inter-chromosomal telomere fusions, occur independently of DNA ligases 3 and 4. Genome Res. 2016;26(5):588–600. doi: 10.1101/gr.200840.115 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4864465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lovejoy CA, Li W, Reisenweber S, Thongthip S, Bruno J, de Lange T, et al. Loss of ATRX, genome instability, and an altered DNA damage response are hallmarks of the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002772. Epub 2012/07/26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002772 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3400581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brosnan-Cashman JA, Yuan M, Graham MK, Rizzo AJ, Myers KM, Davis C, et al. ATRX loss induces multiple hallmarks of the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) phenotype in human glioma cell lines in a cell line-specific manner. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204159. Epub 2018/09/19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204159 eCollection 2018. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6143253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.O’Sullivan RJ, Arnoult N, Lackner DH, Oganesian L, Haggblom C, Corpet A, et al. Rapid induction of alternative lengthening of telomeres by depletion of the histone chaperone ASF1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21(2):167–74. Epub 20140112. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2754 Epub 2014 Jan 12. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3946341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Leung JW, Ghosal G, Wang W, Shen X, Wang J, Li L, et al. Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked gene product ATRX is required for proper replication restart and cellular resistance to replication stress. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(9):6342–50. Epub 20130116. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.411603 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3585069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huh MS, Ivanochko D, Hashem LE, Curtin M, Delorme M, Goodall E, et al. Stalled replication forks within heterochromatin require ATRX for protection. Cell Death & Disease. 2016;7(5):e2220-e. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang Y, Yang J, Wild AT, Wu WH, Shah R, Danussi C, et al. G-quadruplex DNA drives genomic instability and represents a targetable molecular abnormality in ATRX-deficient malignant glioma. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):943. Epub 2019/02/28. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08905-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6391399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Watson LA, Solomon LA, Li JR, Jiang Y, Edwards M, Shin-ya K, et al. Atrx deficiency induces telomere dysfunction, endocrine defects, and reduced life span. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(5):2049–63. Epub 20130408. doi: 10.1172/JCI65634 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3635723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ait Saada A, Lambert SAE, Carr AM. Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway. DNA Repair (Amst). 2018;71:135–47. Epub 2018/09/18. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.017 Epub 2018 Aug 25. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6219450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang JM, Genois MM, Ouyang J, Lan L, Zou L. Alternative lengthening of telomeres is a self-perpetuating process in ALT-associated PML bodies. Mol Cell. 2021;81(5):1027–42.e4. Epub 2021/01/17. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.030 Epub 2021 Jan 15. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abid HZ, McCaffrey J, Raseley K, Young E, Lassahn K, Varapula D, et al. Single-molecule analysis of subtelomeres and telomeres in Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) cells. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):485. Epub 20200715. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06901-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7364475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Seo B, Kim C, Hills M, Sung S, Kim H, Kim E, et al. Telomere maintenance through recruitment of internal genomic regions. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8189. Epub 2015/09/19. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9189 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4595603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Teng SC, Chang J, McCowan B, Zakian VA. Telomerase-independent lengthening of yeast telomeres occurs by an abrupt Rad50p-dependent, Rif-inhibited recombinational process. Molecular Cell. 2000;6(4):947–52. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00094-8 PubMed PMID: WOS:000090136700018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Varley H, Pickett HA, Foxon JL, Reddel RR, Royle NJ. Molecular characterization of inter-telomere and intra-telomere mutations in human ALT cells. Nat Genet. 2002;30(3):301–5. doi: 10.1038/ng834 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kockler ZW, Comeron JM, Malkova A. A unified alternative telomere-lengthening pathway in yeast survivor cells. Mol Cell. 2021. Epub 2021/02/28. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.02.004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee M, Hills M, Conomos D, Stutz MD, Dagg RA, Lau LM, et al. Telomere extension by telomerase and ALT generates variant repeats by mechanistically distinct processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(3):1733–46. Epub 2013/11/15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1117 Epub 2013 Nov 12. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3919612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee M, Teber ET, Holmes O, Nones K, Patch AM, Dagg RA, et al. Telomere sequence content can be used to determine ALT activity in tumours. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(10):4903–18. Epub 2018/05/03. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky297 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6007693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Conomos D, Stutz MD, Hills M, Neumann AA, Bryan TM, Reddel RR, et al. Variant repeats are interspersed throughout the telomeres and recruit nuclear receptors in ALT cells. J Cell Biol. 2012;199(6):893–906. Epub 2012/12/12. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207189 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3518223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Whole genome sequence data and PacBio telomere sequence data have been deposited to SRA (BioProject ID PRJNA796771).