Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 29;6(6):pkac075. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac075

Table 2.

Analysis of moderate-to-severe CIPN at month 9 (mITT set)

Patient group No. Event ratea,b (95% CI) Relative risk vs placeboc (95% CI) P
Combined
 CaM 5 μmol/kg 175 0.548 (0.448 to 0.670) 1.37 (1.01 to 1.86) .045
 Placebo 176 0.400 (0.317 to 0.504)
POLAR-M
 CaM 5 μmol/kg 55 0.485 (0.332 to 0.707) 1.10 (0.64 to 1.89) .74
 Placebo 57 0.443 (0.299 to 0.655)
 CaM 2 μmol/kg 54 0.590 (0.415 to 0.839) 1.38 (0.82 to 2.34) .23
 Placebo 57 0.426 (0.288 to 0.631)
POLAR-A
 CaM 5 μmol/kg 120 0.577 (0.455 to 0.732) 1.52 (1.05 to 2.21) .03
 Placebo 119 0.379 (0.284 to 0.507)
a

Based on Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel analysis adjusted for region (Asia or non-Asia) and cumulative dose of oxaliplatin. CaM = calmangafodipir; CI = confidence interval; CIPN = chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; mITT = modified intention-to-treat; POLAR-A = Preventive Treatment of OxaLiplatin Induced peripherAl neuRopathy in adjuvant setting; POLAR-M = Preventive Treatment of OxaLiplatin Induced peripherAl neuRopathy in metastatic setting.

b

Estimates of event rates per treatment arm of patients with moderate-to-severe CIPN according to the first 4 items of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity 13-item subscale, targeting numbness, tingling, or discomfort in hands and/or feet 9 months after first dose of study treatment for the observed mean cumulative dose of oxaliplatin (mg/m2).

c

Relative risk of the estimated event rate.