Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;2022:2456550. doi: 10.1155/2022/2456550

Table 4.

Overview of documents using deep learning techniques for evaluation of ischemic core and penumbra/prognosis.

References Study objective Date published DL-based approaches Optimal results Imaging tool Performance
Chen et al. [98] Segment of stroke core lesions 2017 CNNs composed of MUSCLE Net and EDD Net Dice score is 0.67 MR (DWI) Comparable to manual segmentation
Ho et al. [99] Locating stroke regions 2017 Autoencoder AUC of 0.68 MR (PWI) 10% better than current traditional clinical method (0.58)
Sheth et al. [100] Evaluating the volume of large vessel occlusion and determining infarct core 2017 CNN (DeepSymNet) Determining infarct core as defined by CTP-RAPID from the CTA with AUC of 0.88 and 0.90 (ischemic core ≤ 30 mL and ≤ 50 mL) CT (CTP) Better than current traditional clinical method
Öman et al. [101] Detecting AIS 2019 3D CNN AUC of 0.93 and Dice of 0.61 CT and CTA-SI Better than current traditional clinical method
Nielsen et al. [102] Predicting the final infarct volume 2018 SegNet AUC of 0.88 9 different biomarkers
Nishi et al. [103] Segment of lesion and predicting clinical outcomes for LVO 2020 3D U-Net AUC value achieved 0.81 DWI
Yu et al. [104] Predicting 3- to 7-day final infarct lesions 2020 2.5D U-Net Achieved a median AUC of 0.92 MRIs