Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2022 Nov 21;5(6):e939. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.939

A comprehensive comparison of the early and late complications of surgical circumcision in neonates and children: A cohort study

Soheila Siroosbakht 1,, Bijan Rezakhaniha 2,
PMCID: PMC9679242  PMID: 36425897

Abstract

Background and Aims

Major circumcision complications are rare; however, circumcision arouses distress in some special cases. The present study aimed to compare infancy and childhood regarding the frequency and relative risk of early and late complications of circumcision.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort data analysis including 240 neonates and 240 children referred for circumcision from 2015 to 2021. All circumcisions were performed using the surgical dorsal‐ventral slits method. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the relative risk (RR) of complications at a confidence Interval of 95%.

Results

The mean age was 19.32 ± 6.5 days for the neonates and 46.1 ± 8.8 months for the children. In general, complications occurred in 61 boys (12.7%), 40 neonates (8.3%), and 21 children (4.4%) (p˂0.001). Bleeding was the most common early complication in six neonates (2.5%) and three children (1.3%), and meatal stenosis was the most common late complication in 10 neonates (4.2%) and four children (1.6%). Meatal web was observed in 11 neonates (4.6%) and four children (1.6%), and the incomplete removal of the prepuce, as “not very satisfactory”, was also noticed in nine neonates (3.75%) and three children (1.3%). The circumcision complications were significantly more frequent in neonates than in children (RR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.46‐4.71, p<0.001). The neonatal circumcisions had a significant risk of the incomplete removal of the prepuce, meatal web, and meatal stenosis compared to children (RR = 3, 95% CI 5.83–10.81, p<0.04; RR = 2.75, 95% CI 0.9–8.3, p˂0.03; RR = 2.5, 95% CI 0.8–7.75, p<0.04, respectively).

Conclusion

The risk of complications is higher in neonates than children. The incomplete removal of prepuce, meatal web, and meatal stenosis are significantly higher in neonates than in children. Before prohibiting or recommending this procedure, practitioners should provide comprehensive information about its risks and benefits. Parents should weigh up the risks and benefits and make the best decision regarding their personal beliefs and customs.

Keywords: children, circumcision, complications, meatal stenosis, neonates

1. INTRODUCTION

The history of circumcision dates back to 2300 BC, when it was first noticed in Egypt. Circumcision in children and infants is one of the most common surgeries worldwide. 1 Globally, approximately 30% of men are circumcised. 2 The most common indication of circumcision is social and ritual. Furthermore, some authors have hypothesized that it may prevent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). 3 , 4

A recent systematic review claimed that the overall benefit to the risk of circumcision is 200:1 to 100:1. The complications of circumcision are often minor and can be easily controlled. Its major complications are rare; however, in some special cases, it arouses distress in parents, children, and the performer, especially if another surgery is necessary. Most children with major complications need revised surgery. The main factors leading to complications are age, lack of sterility, improper cauterization, and inexperienced circumcisers. 5 , 6

The total complication rate of circumcision is 0%–16% (1.5%). The main early and late complications of circumcision are bleeding, glans injury, infection, adhesion, excessive foreskin removal, meatal stenosis and phimosis, and false micropenis (inconspicuous penis). 7 , 8 Neonatal circumcision has rapid healing, a lower complication rate, and less cost. The complication rate of neonatal circumcision is 1.5%, and the rate in older boys is 2.9%. 9 A comprehensive review study revealed that the complication rate was 0.4% in infants and 10–20 folds higher in non‐infant circumcision. 10 Conversely, a study concluded that the complications of circumcision were more frequent in infants than in children. 11 There is a controversy about the complication rates of neonatal and early childhood circumcision. Some studies have indicated that complications are less frequent in infancy than in childhood; however, some other studies have reached different results. They showed that the complications of circumcision in childhood are less frequent than or equal to those in infancy (Table 1). However, the outcomes of circumcision are underreported. In other words, circumcision has some side‐effects not well‐explained in the current era. The rate of complications of circumcision seems to be higher than the one previously reported. 12 Furthermore, most studies have examined a limited number of complications. There is no comprehensive survey of early and late complications in infancy, especially in childhood. In our practice, the rates of circumcision complications were not higher in childhood than in neonates. This study intended to provide circumcisers with deeper knowledge about the adverse effects of circumcision to guide their relevant clinical performance and parental counseling.

Table 1.

The frequency of complications in neonatal and older boys’ circumcision*

Author Country Year Number Age Frequency of complications
Aldemir 15 Turkey 2006 200 2–6 years 5%
Al‐marhoon 15 Oman 1997–2000 171 Neonatal 1.2%
Bazmamoun 15 Iran 2006–2007 394 Mean 9 months 7–10%
Bcheraoui 10 USA 2001–2010 1.4 million Early infant 0.4% infants
Older boys 10‐20 fold in older boys
Eroglo 15 Turkey 2001–2002 214 Neonatal 2.3%
Hung 9 USA 2005–2010 24432 Neonatal 1.5% neonatal
Non‐neonatal (˂5 years) 2.2% non‐neonatal
Iftikhar 15 Pakistan 1998–2001 318 0–12 years 0.6%
Ketabchi 11 Iran 2010–2013 120 Neonatal 27.27% in children
children 2‐ 3 fold in neonates
Moosa 18 Pakistan 2016–2018 2822 1–90 days Minor events 3.8%
Major events 0.3%
Schmitz 15 Malaysia 2001 64 Median 10 years 1.6%
Sharma 15 India 2003 15 2–25 years 13.3%
Rafig 15 Pakistan 2000 100 Neonatal 2%
*

From: references 9, 10, 1115 and 18.

This study aimed to evaluate the early and late complications of surgical circumcision in neonates and childhood and compare the frequency and relative risk of complications between two age groups.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Study setting and design

This study was a retrospective cohort conducted in two tertiary primary care hospitals in Tehran, Iran, from November 2015 to April 2021.

2.2. Participants

Two hundred forty neonates and 240 boys aged 3–5 years, who referred for circumcision, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were healthy boy neonates and 3–5‐year‐old boy children with no external genitalia anomaly, whose parents requested religious and ritual circumcision. Exclusion criteria were meatal stenosis, bleeding disorders, hypospadias, phimosis, prepuce inflammation, glans lichen sclerosis, dermatologic disturbances, and concealed penis. According to Ketabghi et al. 11 and the G‐Power software using the following sample size formula n1=n2=Z1α2+Z1β2[P1(1P1)+P2(1P2)](P1P2)2 at a confidence level of 95% and α = 0.05; β = 0.2; P 1 = 5%; P 2 = 20%; Z 1‐ α2 = 1.96; Z 1‐β = 0.84, and power 80%, the sample size per group was calculated to be 200 subjects. With a 20% drop‐out, 240 subjects were included in each group. During the research, there was no drop‐out. Finally, 440 patients completed the study and were analyzed (Figure 1). A single academic urologist performed all circumcisions. The surgeries were done in a sterile situation using the surgical dorsal‐ventral slits method without a cautery device. The patient was placed supine, with the legs astride to expose the penis. The penis and pelvic area were prepped with povidone‐iodine and draped with a sterile sheet. All babies and most children were circumcised with local anesthesia; however, only some children needed general anesthesia, according to the opinion of the anesthesiologist because of the child's anxiety and non‐cooperation in the operating room. The light general anesthesia was performed with 1 mg/kg ketamine injection without muscle relaxants. Dorsal nerve was blocked five minutes before the surgery by lidocaine 1% without epinephrine. The dorsal penile nerve block was performed by 0.8 mL injection circumferentially or by 0.2–0.4 ml injections at 10 and 2 o'clock at the base of the penis. A curved hemostat was used to separate the adhesions on the glans. Then prepuce was everted, the smegma was cleaned, and any adhesion was lysed. The prepuce was unattached right to the corona. A circumferential incision was made on the inner prepuce, 0.25–0.5 cm proximal to the corona. The prepuce was returned over the glans. Then two straight hemostats were implemented to the distal end of the foreskin at 10 and 2 o'clock. A circumferential incision was performed over the prepuce proximal to the corona with slight traction on the prepuce. Dorsal and ventral slits were done on the prepuce down to the penile skin mark. The prepuce was resected, the bleeding vessels were ligated, starting with the frenular artery, and homeostasis was secured. Finally, the penile skin was sutured to the coronal by a 5/0 chromic catgut. A vaseline gauze dressing was placed around the suture line. The dressing was removed at home after 48 h. All boys were evaluated on the first day, 5th day, and 3 months after the surgery to record any complication. All postsurgical complications were defined and compared between the two age groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study.

2.3. Early and late complications

Early complications were bleeding, urinary retention, infection, inflammation, glans amputation, glans necrosis, hematoma, and the excessive removal of the foreskin. Late complications were meatal stenosis, chordee, skin adhesion to glans, fistula, inclusion cyst, penile rotation, and trapped penis. Late complications were determined as those emerged after 3 months. Incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web were not complications and were defined as “not very satisfactory” regarding the parent's perception of circumcision appearance.

Bleeding that needed to return for surgical control was considered significant and reported. Meatal stenosis was defined as the loss of the elliptical shape of the meatus to a circular shape due to scarring, which was determined by meatal examination in the form of the visual pinpoint narrowing of the urethral meatus. Meatal web was defined based on observing the delicate and soft web at the ventral surface of the urethral meatus. 13

2.4. Main outcome measures

The participants’ basic characteristics and their early and late complications were recorded. Furthermore, the relative risks (RR) of the complications were compared as the main outcome between the two age groups at a confidence interval of 95%.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were represented by frequency and frequency percentages, and mean, and standard deviation were used for the continuous variables. The Chi‐square test (or Fisher's exact tests for cells with <5 data) was utilized to analyze the complications of circumcision in the two age groups. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the RR of complications at the confidence interval of 95%. SPSS software version 21 (IBM SPSS Inc.) was used, and p < 0.05 was set as the significance level.

2.6. Ethical approval

Informed consent was obtained from the parents. The participants’ information was kept confidential. The Research Ethics Committee of the Aja University of Medical Sciences confirmed the study project (Code: IR.AJAUMS.REC.1400.186).

3. RESULTS

In this research, 240 neonates and 240 boys were analyzed. The mean age of neonates was 19.32 ± 6.5 days, and older boys’ mean age was 46.1 ± 8.8 months (Table 2). This study revealed complications in 61 boys (12.7%), 40 neonates (8.3%), and 21 children (4.4%) (p < 0.001). In general, the neonates had a higher risk of complications than children (RR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.46–4.71, p < 0.001). Early complications developed in 26 participants (5.4%), and late complications were observed in 35 subjects (7.3%). Bleeding was the most common early complication in nine cases (1.9%), and meatal stenosis was the most common late complication in 14 cases (2.9%). Meatal web and incomplete removal of prepuce were observed in 15 (3.1%) and 12 (2.5%) cases, respectively. Table 3 shows the other complications.

Table 2.

The average age of subjects in neonates and children groups

Age Neonates, day Children, month
Mean, SD Min Max Mean, SD Min Max
19.32 ± 6.5 7 30 46.1 ± 8.8 35 60

Table 3.

Overall early and late adverse events rates of circumcisions in all subjects a

Early adverse events N (%) Late adverse events N (%)
Bleeding 9 (1.9) Meatal stenosis 14 (2.9)
Urinary retention 6 (1.3) Fistula 1 (0.2)
Infection 4 (0.8) Chordee 3 (0.6)
Necrosis 0 Inclusion cyst 3 (0.6)
Glans amputation 0 Skin adhesion to glans 9 (1.9)
hematoma 3 (0.6) Trapped penis 0
Excessive removal of foreskin 4 (0.8) Penile rotation 5 (1.1)
Overall 26 (5.4) Overall 35 (7.3)
Incomplete removal of prepuceb 12 (2.5) Web of meatusb 15 (3.1)
a

Bleeding was the most common early complication and meatal stenosis was the most common late complication.

b

Incomplete removal of prepuce and web of meatus were not complications and were defined as “not very satisfactory” regarding the parent's perception of circumcision appearance.

According to the participants’ age, accumulative complication rates are shown in Table 4. Among the 240 neonates, complications occurred in 40 cases (16.7%), of which 6.7% (n = 16) were early, and 10% (n = 24) were late. Bleeding was the most common early complication in six neonates (2.5%), and meatal stenosis was the most common late complication in 10 cases (4.2%). Furthermore, meatal web and the incomplete removal of prepuce were also observed in 11 (4.6%) and nine (3.8%) cases, respectively.

Table 4.

The frequency of adverse events in neonates and children circumcision a

Complications N (%) Neonates Children RR CI 95% p value
Lower‐Upper
Bleeding 6 (2.5) 3 (1.3) 2 0.51–7.81 0.49
Urinary retention 4 (1.6) 2 (0.8) 2 0.37–10.7 0.68
Infection 2 (0.8) 2 (0.8) 1 0.14–6.98 0.98
Necrosis 0 0
Glans amputation 0 0
hematoma 1 (0.4) 2 (0.8) ‐ 1.3 0.16–4.61 0.39
Excessive removal of foreskin 3 (1.3) 1 (0.4) 2.5 0.49–12.73 0.44
Meatal stenosis 10 (4.2) 4 (1.6) 2.5 0.8–7.7 0.04
Fistula 1 (0.4) 0 1 0.06–15.8 0.98
Chordee 2 (0.8) 1 (0.4) 1.66 0.4–6.82 0.72
Inclusion cyst 2 (0.8) 1 (0.4) 2.5 0.49–12.63 0.44
Skin adhesion to glans 6 (2.5) 3 (1.3) 2 0.51–7.81 0.49
Trapped penis 0 0
Penile rotation 3 (1.3) 2 (0.8) 1.5 0.25–8.81 0.98
Overall 40 (16.7) 21 (8.8) 2.6 1.46–4.71 0.001
Incomplete removal of prepuceb 9 (3.8) 3 (1.3) 3 5.83–10.81 0.04
Meatal webb 11 (4.6) 4 (1.6) 2.75 0.9–8.3 0.03

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.

a

Overall, the neonates had a higher risk of complications than children (RR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.46–4.71, p = 0.001). The neonatal circumcisions more significantly had the risk of the meatal stenosis compared to children (RR = 2.5, 95% CI 0.8–7.75, p = 0.04).

b

Incomplete removal of prepuce and web of meatus define as “not very satisfactory” under parent's perception of circumcision appearance. The neonatal circumcisions more significantly had the risk of the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web compared to children (RR = 3, 95% CI 5.83–10.81, p = 0.04; RR = 2.75, 95% CI 0.9–8.3, p = 0.03, respectively).

Among the 240 older boys, complications occurred in 21 cases (8.8%), of which 4.2% (n = 10) were early and 4.6% (n = 11) were late. Bleeding was the most common early complication in three cases (1.3%), and meatal stenosis was the most common late complication in four cases (1.6%). Furthermore, meatal web and incomplete removal of prepuce were observed in four (1.6%) and three (1.3%) participants, respectively.

Bleeding and meatal stenosis was the most common complication in both groups. Furthermore, the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web were the most common adverse events, which were defined as “not very satisfactory” according to the parents’ perception of circumcision appearance in both groups. The neonatal circumcisions more significantly had the risk of the incomplete removal of prepuce, meatal web, and meatal stenosis compared to children (RR = 3, 95% CI 5.83–10.81, p < 0.04; RR = 2.75, 95% CI 0.9–8.3, p < 0.03; RR = 2.5, 95% CI 0.8–7.75, p < 0.04; respectively).

4. DISCUSSION

The controversy about the complication rates of circumcision is significant, especially in infancy and early childhood. The main purpose of this study was to determine the relative risk of complications in infancy and childhood. This study showed that the cumulative rates of circumcision complications were higher in neonates than in children (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). Although bleeding and meatal stenosis were the most common complications in both groups, neonatal circumcisions had a significantly higher risk of meatal stenosis compared to children. Furthermore, the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web were the most adverse events defined as “not very satisfactory” in both groups; however, the neonatal circumcisions had a significantly higher risk of the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web compared to children.

4.1. Comparison of circumcision complications

One study in Iran reported no difference between the complication rates in neonates and children. In general, the obtained rates were as follows: incomplete removal of prepuce (3.6%), excessive removal of foreskin (1.3%), meatal stenosis (0.9%), inclusion cyst (0.7%), rotation of penis (0.5%), and chordee (0.2%). 16 However, in the present study, 16 main adverse side‐effects were revealed. The frequencies of the incomplete removal of prepuce and the excessive removal of the foreskin were lower in the present study.

A systematic review determined that the complication rates were 1.5% (0%–16%) in neonates and 6% (2%–14%) in children. 17 In another study, the frequency of complications was 8.5% in children. The inconsistencies in the complication rates were caused by the difference in the circumcisers’ training level rather than the participants’ age. 18

A study on 300 children with a mean age of 9 years (3–16 years) reported that the total, early and late complication rates were 4.7%, 1%, and 3.7%, respectively. 14 They studied only a few adverse events (bleeding, pain, retention, and meatal stenosis). However, in the present study, the total rate of complication was 8.8% in children. This difference may be due to this fact that this study comprehensively investigated the minor and major events (n = 16).

A study in Pakistan showed that older children had a higher risk of complications than infants. They recommended circumcision to be performed on infants aged below 3 months. 19 In each community, the best timing of this procedure is defined by tradition and faith. Parental decision on neonatal or older boys’ circumcision is usually based on the parent's choice and accurate knowledge received from health workers. The providers should be informed of the potential adverse events of circumcision to better counsel the parents for more accurate decisions. 15 , 20 , 21 We aimed to provide health workers with deeper knowledge about the adverse events of circumcision to guide their relevant clinical performance and parental counseling.

4.2. Meatal stenosis and meatal web

Meatal stenosis is a potential adverse event of circumcision, and there is a controversy about its rate. Furthermore, there is a disagreement on the diagnosis and morphological definition of meatal stenosis. The frequency of this issue is 5%–20%, with RR = 10.3. 22 A study showed that the risk of meatal stenosis was 7.29 in children circumcision. 23 Another study reported a higher frequency of meatal stenosis (40%), especially if the heating cautery device was utilized. 24 In contrast, a systematic review demonstrated that the RR of meatal stenosis was <1. 25 This inconsistency may be caused by misdiagnosis, as in many cases, meatal web is reported as meatal stenosis. A narrow pinpoint meatus with fibrosis is the precise accepted definition of meatal stenosis, and meatal web is defined based on observing the delicate and soft web at the ventral surface of the urethral meatus. 26 In our study, the frequencies of meatal stenosis and meatal web were higher in neonates than in children (4.2% vs. 1.6% and 4.6% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Furthermore, the relative risk of meatal stenosis and meatal web were 2.5 and 2.75 in neonatal circumcision.

Meatal stenosis is usually an unrecognized side‐effect of circumcision, and the asymptomatic presentation of meatal stenosis is high. Precise meatal examination is suggested in circumcised neonates and older boys. Furthermore, because of the high incidence of this issue, informed consent should be obtained from the parents. 27

4.3. Bleeding

Bleeding is a common complication of circumcision. It is mild in most cases and does not require re‐control. Underlying diseases such as lichen sclerosis and bleeding disorders can cause severe bleeding and hematoma. 28 In the present study, although the frequency of bleeding was higher in neonates (2.5%) than in children (1.3%) with a relative risk of 2, it was not statistically significant. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation and a history of bleeding disorders should also be considered.

4.4. Cutaneous complications

The most common cutaneous adverse effects of circumcision included the incomplete removal of the prepuce, the excessive removal of the foreskin, chordee, foreskin adhesion to glans, fistula, inclusion cyst, penile rotation, and trapped penis. 29 , 30 A meta‐analysis revealed that new suture devices had fewer cutaneous complications than traditional surgical circumcision. 31 Urethrocutaneous fistula is a rare but serious side‐effect of circumcision that concerns the parents and children and needs reoperation in most situation. Untrained practitioners and un‐sterility are the most important factors leading to this problem. 32 In our study, the frequency of cutaneous complications was 0.4%–2.5% in neonates and 0.4%–1.3% in children; however, there was no statistically significant difference in skin complications between the two groups. The incomplete removal of the foreskin was observed with a significant relative risk in neonates than children (RR = 3). Proper patient selection, sterility, and correct surgical techniques can decrease the prevalence of circumcision complications.

4.5. Limitations and recommendations

One of the limitations of this study was that circumcision complications were not studied in children aged below 3 years because of the small number of cases in this age group. This procedure is recommended to be done in medical departments under sterile conditions by well‐trained providers. Under these circumstances, the benefits of this surgery outweigh the potentially rare and generally minor adverse effects of circumcision. Furthermore, practitioners should also obtain comprehensive information about the risks and benefits before prohibiting or recommending this procedure in infancy or childhood, and parents should weigh up the risks and benefits and make the best decision based on their personal beliefs and customs to perform circumcision in neonatal or early childhood.

5. CONCLUSION

According to the findings of the present study, although bleeding and meatal stenosis were the most common complication in neonates and older boys, neonatal circumcision had a significantly higher risk of meatal stenosis compared to children. Furthermore, the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web were the adverse events defined as “not very satisfactory” in both groups; however, the neonatal circumcision had a significantly higher risk of the incomplete removal of prepuce and meatal web compared to children. This study intended to provide circumcisers with deeper knowledge about the adverse effects of circumcision to guide their relevant clinical performance and parental counseling.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Soheila Siroosbakht: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; methodology; project administration; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review & editing. Bijan Rezakhaniha: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; supervision; validation; writing – original draft; writing – review & editing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Authors have no conflict of interest.

TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

The lead author Soheila Siroosbakht, Bijan Rezakhaniha affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank faculty and members of pediatrics department of Imam Reza & Golestan hospital and all parents who participant in this project. This research was not supported.

Siroosbakht S, Rezakhaniha B. A comprehensive comparison of the early and late complications of surgical circumcision in neonates and children: a Cohort study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5:e939. 10.1002/hsr2.939

Contributor Information

Soheila Siroosbakht, Email: soheilasirousbakht@gmail.com.

Bijan Rezakhaniha, Email: reza.bijan@yahoo.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Prabhakaran S, Ljuhar D, Coleman R, Nataraja RM. Circumcision in the paediatric patient: a review of indications, technique and complications. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(12):1299‐1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. WHO/UNAIDS: Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. World Health Organization; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ezomike U, Chinawa J, Enebe J, et al. Evaluation of maternal preferences for neonatal male circumcision in Enugu Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022;19(2):73‐77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jacobs AJ. Is physical alteration a sufficient reason to prohibit ritual infant circumcision? J Relig Health. 2021;60(3):1672‐1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alkhenizan A, Elabd K. Non‐therapeutic infant male circumcision. Evidence, ethics, and international law perspectives. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(9):941‐947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Morris BJ, Moreton S, Krieger JN. Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: a systematic review. J Evid‐Based Med. 2019;12(4):263‐290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Omole F, Smith W, Carter‐Wicker K. Newborn circumcision techniques. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(11):680‐685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rezakhaniha S, Rezakhaniha B, Siroosbakht S. Which of the anthropometric parameters and hormonal variables in prepubertal children are correlated to true micropenis? Iran J Ped. 2021;31(1):e108534. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hung YC, Chang DC, Westfal ML, Marks IH, Masiakos PT, Kelleher CM. A longitudinal population analysis of cumulative risks of circumcision. J Surg Res. 2019;233:111‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. El Bcheraoui C, Zhang X, Cooper CS, Rose CE, Kilmarx PH, Chen RT. Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):625‐634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ketabchi AA, Ahmadinejad M, Farjah‐ Shahrokhi Ebrahimipour M, R Afshar Y. Comparison of the late complications of circumcision in different age groups. J Compr Pediatr. 2017;(2):e59340. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impotence Res. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Upadhyay V, Hammodat HM, Pease PW. Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years’ experience. N Z Med J. 1998;111(1060):57‐58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jones P, Rooney H, Hawary A. Pediatric circumcision in the 21st century national health service: a snapshot of practice in a United Kingdom center. Surg J. 2020;06(4):e188‐e191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Frisch M, Simonsen J. Non‐therapeutic male circumcision in infancy or childhood and risk of human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections: national cohort study in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37(3):251‐259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yegane RA, Kheirollahi AR, Salehi NA, Bashashati M, Khoshdel JA, Ahmadi M. Late complications of circumcision in Iran. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22(5):442‐445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2010;10:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Naji H, Mustafa R. Circumcision of preschool boys in Baghdad, Iraq: prevalence, current practice and complications. Frontiers of Medicine. 2013;7(1):122‐125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Moosa S, Muhammad AA, Dogar S, et al. Implementation of an infant male circumcision programme, Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99(4):250‐258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Özveren B. Defining the pathways of parental decision‐making and satisfaction levels about newborn circumcision in a setting where traditional Male circumcision is prevalent: an online survey study. Urology. 2016;90:153‐158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2021;3(2):99‐123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Frisch M, Simonsen J. Cultural background, non‐therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: two nationwide register‐based cohort studies in Denmark 1977‐2013. Surgeon. 2018;16(2):107‐118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Van Howe RS. Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting. Clin Pediatr. 2006;45(1):49‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Abid A, Hussein N. Meatal stenosis posttraditional neonatal circumcision‐cross‐sectional study. Urol Ann. 2021;13(1):62‐66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Does circumcision increase meatal stenosis risk? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Urology. 2017;110:16‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Özen MA, Gündoğdu G, Taşdemir M, Eroğlu E. Complication of newborn circumcision: meatal stenosis or meatal web? J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(6):617.e1‐617.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Morgan AM, Hu YY, Benin A, Lockwood GM. Decision‐Making regarding newborn circumcision: a qualitative analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2021;25(12):1972‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Somov P, Chan BKY, Wilde C, Corbett H. Bleeding after circumcision is more likely in children with lichen sclerosus (Balanitis xerotica obliterans). J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(2):208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rezakhaniha S, Rezakhaniha B, Aarabi N, Siroosbakht S. Is it necessary to weight loss in obese boys with small penile length? A case‐control study. J Compr Pediatr. 2020;11(4):e107272. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Maddileti V, Gazula S, Dantala P. Primary care of preputial adhesions in children ‐ a retrospective cohort study. Malaysian Family Phys. 2022;17(1):52‐56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Huang C, Song P, Xu C, Wang R, Wei L, Zhao X. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: a network meta‐analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;43:17‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ikuerowo S, Bioku M, Omisanjo O, Esho J. Urethrocutaneous fistula complicating circumcision in children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(2):145‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES