Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72(4):1077–1087. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190643

TABLE 2.

Regression analysis of the relationship between AMB prevalence and AD neuropathological load

Predictors Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
P value
CERAD 0 (indicator)
CERAD 1 1.325
(0.873-2.011)
0.187
CERAD 2 2.433
(1.724-3.433)
0.001
CERAD 3 3.928
(2.897-5.326)
0.001
BRAAK 0 (indicator)
BRAAK 1 0.548
(0.282-1.065)
0.076
BRAAK 2 0.520
(0.282-0.958)
0.036
BRAAK 3 0.606
(0.330-1.112)
0.106
BRAAK 4 0.868
(0.497-1.518)
0.620
BRAAK 5 1.644
(0.967-2.797)
0.066
BRAAK 6 2.268
(1.349-3.813)
0.002
LAD (indicator)
IAD 2.152
(1.621-2.858)
0.001
HAD 3.472
(2.748-4.386)
0.001

Table representing the relationship between AD pathological load, separately and jointly, and AMB prevalence. Predictors referred to presence of neuritic plaques (CERAD score), neurofibrillary pathology (Braak & Braak score) or joint AD pathological load (LAD-HAD). Numerical values within each column represent Odds Ratio (OR) with associated 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) and p value. The relationship between AD neuropathological load and AMB was assessed in an unadjusted logistic regression model.