Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;6(3):BJGPO.2022.0012. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of quantitative results.

Serial Theme Question Total responses, n ‘Yes’ answers, n %
1 Impact on practice Greater understanding of veterans 229 193 84
2 More aware of veterans' needsVery awareAwareSomewhat awareSlightly awareNot at all aware 232 6211838122 27511651
3 Impact of programme on practice (0 no impact–10 significant impact) 231 (mode 5; mean; 5; median 5; standard deviation 2.53)
4 Impact on veteran Age group most likely to engage18–3940–5960–79≥80All equally likely to engage 230 248943668 103919330
5 Veteran awareness of programmeVery awareAwareSomewhat awareSlightly awareNot at all aware 231 638767140 317333117
6 Veteran awareness of veteran-specific priority treatmentVery awareAwareNeutralSome awarenessUnaware 231 675597318 33326328
7 Perceived benefit to veteran of their GP having greater understanding of needsSignificant benefitSome benefitNeutralLittle benefitNo benefit 231 4412246145 19532062
8 Impact of programme on veteran (0 no impact–10 significant impact) 232 (mode 5; mean 5.60; median 6; standard deviation 2.35)
9 Programme management Would recommend accreditation programme 231 228 99
10 Accreditation processVery easyEasyNeutralDifficultVery difficult 232 601165330 26502310
11 Communication with RCGP during accreditation processVery goodGoodNeutralPoorVery poor 230 431275451 19552420.4
Preferred training material (multiple response question)Online moduleFace-to-face courseRCGP veteran-specific newsletterWebsite updatesOther (central resource database or contacts with veteran organisations) 194631801396 842777603

RCGP = Royal College of General Practitioners.