Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;1(2):100015. doi: 10.1016/j.bpr.2021.100015

Table 2.

Comparison of fitted and simulated parameters

Fit Simulation
D (pixels2 frame−1) 2.80 ± 0.08 3
K (frame−1) 0.86 ± 0.01 0.9
ρon 0.38 ± 0.03 0.44
fD 0.26 ± 0.02 0.3

The parameters are for fits shown Fig. 3. Simulation had photobleaching rate kp = 10−4 frame−1 and was generated on 128 × 128 pixel grid with 10,744 total particles and T =2048 frames. Fitted parameters and errors were obtained by splitting the simulation spatially into five 64 × 64 ROIs, with some overlap between different parts, and then calculating the mean and its SE from their analyses. The ROIs were chosen so that a significant portion of the simulated dendritic structure was encompassed overall.