Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;2022(11):CD013683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013683.pub2

Summary of findings 3. Heparin started before compared to after the surgical procedure for preventing venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery.

Heparin started before versus after the surgical procedure for preventing venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery
Patient or population: people undergoing bariatric surgery
Setting: hospital
Intervention: heparin started 12 hours before surgery
Comparison: heparin started after surgery
Outcomes № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Relative effect
(95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)
Risk with heparin after surgery Risk with heparin 12 h before surgery
VTE
Follow‐up: 15 days 100
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b RR 0.11
(0.01 to 2.01) Study population
80 per 1000 9 per 1000 (1 to 161)
Major bleeding
Follow‐up: 15 days 100
(1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,d RR 3.00
(0.13 to 71.92) Study population
0 per 1000 0 per 1000
(0 to 0)
All‐cause mortality
Follow‐up: 15 days 100
(1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,c Not estimable 1 study reported no events.
VTE‐related mortality
Follow‐up: 15 days 100
(1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,c Not estimable 1 study reported no events.
PE Not reported
DVT
Follow‐up: 15 days 100
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b RR 0.11
(0.01 to 2.01) Study population
80 per 1000 9 per 1000 (1 to 161)
Adverse events (thrombocytopenia) Not reported
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; VTE: venous thromboembolism.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level due to high risk of performance bias.
bDowngraded one level due to imprecision: few participants, and 95% CI consistent with possible benefit and possible harm.
cDowngraded two levels due to imprecision: no events.
dDowngraded two levels due to imprecision: very large CI of the absolute difference and few events.