Steib 2016.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Methods: multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, 3‐arm, parallel‐group, double‐blind Country: France Duration: July 2010–August 2013 |
|
Participants | Number randomised: 164; experimental group: 56; control group 1: 54; control group 2: 54 Number analysed: 148 (90.2%); experimental group: 53; control group 1: 47; control group 2: 48 Mean age: experimental group: 39.5 (SD 1.7) years; control group 1: 40 (SD 1.5) years; control group 2: 39 (SD 1.5) years Sex (male/female): 29/107 Comorbidities
Mean bodyweight: not reported Mean BMI: experimental group: 47 (SD 1) kg/m2; control group 1: 48 (SD 1) kg/m2; control group 2: 49 (SD 1) kg/m2 Bariatric surgery techniques
Rationale for bariatric surgery indication: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Experimental: enoxaparin 4000 IU bid Control 1: enoxaparin 6000 IU once daily Control 2: enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily Level of experience of the person carrying out the procedure: not reported Concomitant interventions
Excluded medications: NSAIDs |
|
Outcomes | Primary (specified)
Primary (collected)
Secondary (specified)
Secondary (collected)
Time points reported: until 30 days after the procedure Cost of treatment: not reported |
|
Funding source | Quote: "This work was sponsored two thirds by institutional grants (Program of Interregional Research) and one third by industrial grants (Sanofi‐Aventis). Funding was managed by the Research Department of Strasbourg University Hospital." Quote: "Financial supporters had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection and analysis of the data, or in the preparation of the manuscript." |
|
Declarations of interest of study authors | Quote: "The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article." | |
Notes | Protocol available (NCT00444652) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Incomplete information. Quote: "patients were randomly assigned to groups". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | High risk | Open‐label study (protocol information). |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | High risk | Open‐label study (protocol information). |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | 16 participants were not treated according to protocol (9%), but the reasons were reported, and the losses were balanced between the groups. Quote: "One patient refused to participate to the study before treatment, 15 patients were not treated for logistic reasons (4 cancellations of surgery, 6 absences of investigators, 4 preoperative deviations from protocol, and 1 gaseous embolism)". |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | We do not suspect any other bias related to this study. |
bid: twice daily; BMI: body mass index; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DM: diabetes mellitus; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; GORD: gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease; HIT: heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia; IU: international unit; LMWH: low‐molecular‐weight heparin; LRYB: laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass; MRV: magnetic resonance venography; NSAIDs: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; OCP: oral contraceptive pill; PE: pulmonary embolism; RYB: Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SC: subcutaneously; SD: standard deviation; tid: three times daily; UFH: unfractionated heparin; VKA: vitamin‐K antagonist; VTE: venous thromboembolism.