Table 2.
Analysis of the regression relationship between the variables.
| Regression equation (N = 606) | Overall fit coefficient | Significance of regression coefficients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resulting variables | Predictor variables | R | R2 | F | β | t |
| School adaptation | 0.650 | 0.423 | 50.357 | |||
| Gender | −0.026 | −1.649 | ||||
| Grade Level | 0.054 | 1.586 | ||||
| Parent–child attachment | 0.467 | 7.311*** | ||||
| Companionship | 0.515 | 0.265 | 24.744*** | |||
| Gender | −0.031 | −0.512 | ||||
| Grade | −0.043 | −0.691 | ||||
| Parent–child attachment | 0.503 | 8.262*** | ||||
| Hometown identity | 0.475 | 0.225 | 14.907*** | |||
| Gender | 0.052 | 0.838 | ||||
| Grade Level | −0.016 | −0.259 | ||||
| Parent–child attachment | 0.226 | 3.118** | ||||
| Companionship | 0.314 | 4.381*** | ||||
| School adaptation | 0.732 | 0.536 | 47.118*** | |||
| Gender | −0.023 | −0.479 | ||||
| Grade | −0.102 | −2.063* | ||||
| Parent–child attachment | 0.310 | 5.389*** | ||||
| Companionship | 0.346 | 5.948*** | ||||
| Hometown identity | 0.228 | 4.203*** | ||||
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. All continuous variables in the model were standardized; gender and grade were dummy coded, 1 = male, 2 = female.