Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 9;9:971913. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.971913

TABLE 4.

MR estimates from different methods assessing the causal effect of NAFLD on lean body mass.

Exposure Outcome Method Beta 95%CI P
NAFLD
(4 SNPs, F statistic = 74.299, MR power = 0.43)
Whole body lean mass IVW –0.068 −0.179 to 0.043 0.229
Weighted median –0.040 −0.150 to 0.071 0.484
MR-Egger 0.180 -0.098 to 0.457 0.333
Cochran’s Q = 0.499 (P = 0.779); MR-Egger intercept = −0.110 (P = 0.203)
MR-PRESSO –0.068 −0.179 to 0.043 0.315
Weighted mode –0.019 −0.142 to 0.104 0.780
NAFLD
(4 SNPs, F statistic = 74.299, MR power = 0.08)
Appendicular lean mass IVW –0.020 −0.092 to 0.051 0.574
Weighted median –0.013 −0.082 to 0.056 0.709
MR-Egger 0.124 -0.046 to 0.294 0.290
Cochran’s Q = 1.230 (P = 0.541); MR-Egger intercept = −0.063 (P = 0.218)
MR-PRESSO –0.020 −0.092 to 0.051 0.613
Weighted mode 0.002 −0.076 to 0.081 0.955

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; IVW, inverse variance weighted; PRESSO, pleiotropy residual sum and outlier.