Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;12:04088. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04088

Table 2.

Fitted coefficients from random effects meta-regression of the difference in mean hemoglobin (g/L), non-DHS survey less DHS survey, in each survey pair. Two regressions were fitted, one for non-pregnant women or women pregnancy status was not reported, and one for preschool-aged children. Indicator variables were included when the type of blood collection or analytic approach used by the non-DHS survey differed from that of its near-in-time DHS survey. The intercept corresponds to the difference in mean haemoglobin when both surveys collected blood via capillary puncture and analyzed haemoglobin using the same HemoCue® model (either confirmed or suspected)

Differing survey method (indicator variables) Number of survey pairs Fitted regression coefficient and 95% CI (g/L) P-value
Non-pregnant women/women (n=13 study pairs)
Venipuncture (non-DHS) vs. capillary puncture (DHS)
9
0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
0.712
HemoCue® Hb 301 (non-DHS) vs. HemoCue® Hb 201+ (DHS)
5
5.8 (3.2, 8.3)
<0.001
Laboratory-based methods (non-DHS) vs. any HemoCue® (DHS)
3
-4.6 (-7.5, -1.8)
0.001
Intercept

-0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
0.536
Preschool-aged children (n=17)
Venipuncture (non-DHS) vs. capillary puncture (DHS)
8
3.8 (0.8, 6.7)
0.012
HemoCue® Hb 301 (non-DHS) vs. HemoCue® Hb 201+ (DHS)
6
4.3 (1.4, 7.2)
0.004
Laboratory-based methods (non-DHS) vs. any HemoCue® (DHS)
2
-4.2 (-8.8, 0.4)
0.075
Intercept 2.1 (0.0, 4.2) 0.053