Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 8;10(11):e37579. doi: 10.2196/37579

Table 5.

Evaluation of immunization information sheet use, among parents who reported receiving the 15-month reminder (n=114) and public health center staff (n=19).

Variable Response, n (%)

Mill Woods Lethbridge Total
Parents

Read web-based information about vaccines (n=114)


Yes 31 (52.5) 20 (36.4) 51 (44.7)


No 28 (47.5) 35 (63.6) 63 (55.3)

Language or languages read (n=51)a,b,c


English 29 (93.5) 18 (90) 47 (92.2)


Punjabi 6 (19.4) 1 (5) 7 (13.7)


Tagalog 2 (6.5) 0 (0) 2 (3.9)


Spanish 0 (0) 2 (10) 2 (3.9)


French 1 (3.2) 0 (0) 1 (2)

Helpful to read immunization information in language of choice (n=51)a


Yes 31 (100) 20 (100) 51 (100)


No 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

After reading the immunization information, felt more prepared for child’s appointment (n=51)a


Yes 30 (96.8) 20 (100) 50 (98)


No 1 (3.2) 0 (0) 1 (2)

Reasons for not reading the web-based immunization information (n=63)b,d


Already knew the information 11 (39.3) 17 (48.6) 28 (44.4)


Did not see a link to information in reminder 5 (17.9) 1 (2.9) 6 (9.5)


Too long 2 (7.1) 2 (5.7) 4 (6.3)


Forgot 2 (7.1) 1 (2.9) 3 (4.8)


Not enough time 0 (0) 3 (8.6) 3 (4.8)


Language of choice not available 1 (3.6) 1 (2.9) 2 (3.2)


Felt information was unnecessary, as had already decided to get child immunized 2 (7.1) 0 (0) 2 (3.2)


Felt doctors or nurses would provide the information 2 (7.1) 0 (0) 2 (3.2)


Had no concerns with immunization 0 (0) 2 (5.7) 2 (3.2)


Difficult to understand 0 (0) 1 (2.9) 1 (1.6)


Font too small on device screen 0 (0) 1 (2.9) 1 (1.6)


Did not specify 3 (10.7) 8 (22.9) 11 (17.5)
PHCe staff: nurses

Impact of offering immunization information sheets in other languages (n=19)


I did not notice any change 6 (50) 1 (10) 7 (36.8)


More clients read the information sheets than usual 4 (33.3) 2 (20) 6 (31.6)


Not sure or I do not know 2 (16.7) 2 (20) 4 (21.1)


Other 0 (0) 2 (20) 2 (10.5)

Impact of offering immunization information sheets in other languages on the conversation about vaccines during the visit (n=19)


I did not notice any change 6 (50) 2 (20) 8 (42.1)


I noticed more clients engaging in the conversation than usual 4 (33.3) 0 (0) 4 (21.1)


Not sure or I do not know 2 (16.7) 5 (50) 7 (36.8)

Impact of offering immunization information sheets in other languages on the efficiency of exchanging knowledge with clients during the visit (n=19)


I do not think it changed anything 5 (41.7) 1 (10) 6 (31.2)


I noticed more clients asking questions about vaccines than usual 5 (41.7) 1 (10) 6 (31.2)


Not sure or I do not know 2 (16.7) 5 (50) 7 (36.8)

How to increase use of the immunization information sheets (n=22)b,f


Provide the link to the website in the appointment reminder text (ie, the 3-day reminder) 9 (75) 8 (80) 17 (77.3)


Promote the website using posters or handouts in the health center 9 (75) 7 (70) 16 (72.7)


Have printed copies of the information sheets (in various languages) available at the health center 6 (50) 6 (60) 12 (54.5)


Other 0 (0) 1 (10) 1 (4.5)

aFor parents who reported reading web-based immunization information (Mill Woods: n=31, Lethbridge: n=20).

bRespondents could select more than one option.

cOther potential language options included Arabic, Chinese, Italian, and Vietnamese; however, these options were not selected by any parent.

dFor parents who reported that they did not read web-based immunization information (Mill Woods: n=28, Lethbridge: n=35).

ePHC: public health center.

fQuestion asked to all public health center staff (n=22).