Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;10:196. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01360-6

Table 2.

Differences in the physical and chemical properties of the soil surrounding the roots between all populations and bulk soil before ex situ transplantation

Population pH EC (μS cm−1) TN (g kg−1) SOM (g kg−1) AP (μg g−1) AK (μg g−1)
ZTI 5.22±0.03b 42.62±0.58c 0.97±0.03ab 38.17±5.23bc 33.17±0.61b 61.03±11.31a
AJSI 5.38±0.12a 51.44±10.35c 0.77±0.01c 36.81±0.79bc 32.8±2.16b 52.67±1.1ab
STSI 4.98±0.08c 41.41±6.47c 0.9±0.05abc 44.61±6.26ab 36.84±3.62a 58.95±0.76a
BS 5.43±0.12a 41.84±3.86c 0.75±0.06c 42.40±4.65ab 13.46±1.34c 34.14±4.72cd
ZT 5.5±0.01a 88.7±2.16a 1.01±0.04a 46.48±5.5a 14.1±0.92c 30.87±5.49cd
AJS 5.44±0.07a 85.4±2.81a 0.85±0.05bc 26.34±2.44d 6.09±1.09d 29.22±6.74d
STS 5.37±0.07ab 72.78±0.39b 0.55±0.18d 31.88±0.8cd 16.98±0.47c 42.09±1.46bc

The data in the table are the mean ± standard deviation, and different lowercase letters indicate significant (ρ < 0.05) differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test

EC electrical conductivity, TN total nitrogen, SOM soil organic matter, AP available phosphorus, AK available potassium

Wild rice samples were collected from three in situ natural reserves, Zhangtang (ZTI), Anjiashan (AJSI), and Shuitaoshu (STSI), bulk soil before ex situ transplantation (BS), and three ex situ populations, Zhangtang (ZT), Anjiashan (AJS), and Shuitaoshu (STS)