Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;14:175. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01122-4

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic features of the diagnostic cohorts

Con AD PD spectrum bvFTD ALS CJD
N 75 73 26 18 20 22
f/m 45/30 47/26 11/15 9/9 8/12 14/8
Age (years) 69±13 70±8 70±8 68±10 64±13 65±8
CSF VILIP-1 [pg/ml]a 91 (72−119) 154 (119−220) 112 (62−166) 105 (81−134) 98 (64−141) 624 (326−1173)
Serum VILIP-1 [pg/ml]b 23 (18–31) 33 (24–36) 27 (18–32) 28 (21–42) 26 (20–46) 96 (52–142)
CSF t-tau [pg/ml]c 239 (159–307) 689 (517–932) 285 (152–325) 331 (260–426) 199 (141–337) 8275 (4403–19,408)
CSF p-tau 181 49 (36–70) 120 (94–148) 49 (36–64) 43 (27–57) 37 (29–57) N/A
CSF Abeta 1-42 [pg/ml]d 985 (778–1255) 487 (417–593) 899 (517–1116) 871 (735–1157) 945 (786–1147) N/A
MMSE N/A 23 (17–26) 28 (23.5–29) 26 (24–27) N/A N/A
CDR SOB N/A 3.5 (2–5) 0.5 (0–2.5) 3.75 (2.5–8.9) N/A N/A

Age in mean±SD. For all other concentrations, the median and IQR are shown. aAD vs. Con and CJD vs. Con, PD spectrum, FTD, ALS p<0.0001. AD vs. ALS p=0.006, vs. PD spectrum p=0.0055, vs. FTD p=0.0032, vs. CJD p=0.0029. bAD vs. Con p=0.0057, CJD vs. Con, vs. AD, vs PD spectrum p<0.0001. CJD vs. FTD p=0.0002. CJD vs. ALS p=0.0004. cAD and CJD vs. all other groups p<0.0001. AD vs. CJD p=0.033. dAD vs. all other groups p<0.0001; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CDR SOB, clinical dementia rating sum of boxes; CJD, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Con, non-neurodegenerative control; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; f, female; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; IQR, interquartile range; m, male; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; N/A, not applicable; PD, Parkinson’s disease