Compared studies with previous researchers for the investigation of photocatalysis property under different conditions.
| Experiment name | Illumination/time (min) | Reduction in degradation% | Dyes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2@CNF3 | UV lamp/300 | 14.8 | Rho-B | Present work |
| Pristine TiO2 | UV lamp/300 | 95 | Rho-B | Present work |
| Silica–ZnO | Xenon lam/100 | 39 | Rho-B | 47 |
| Silica–ZnO | Xenon lamp/100 | 42 | MB | 48 |
| Silica–ZnO | Xenon lamp/150 | 45.9 | Rho-B | 49 |
| PVP–silica@ZnO | Xenon lamp/120 | 45.4 | Rho-B | 50 |
| PVP-capped ZnO | — | 36.6 | Rho-B | 51 |
| 2 : 1 CHI/TiO2 | UV lamp/120 | 60.5 | CV | 52 |
| 2 : 1 CHI/TiO2 | UV lamp/120 | 41.7 | CV | 52 |
| TiO2@Y2O3(10 wt%) | UV lamp/30 | 36.4 | CV | 53 |
| TiO2@Y2O3(5 wt%) | UV lamp/30 | 47.5 | CV | 53 |
| Sg1 and SV1 | Xenon lamp/30 | 40–30 | Rho-B | 54 |
| 6 wt% Mn–ZnO | UV lamp/210 | 36 | MB | 55 |
| 2 wt% Mn–ZnO | UV lamp/210 | 47 | MB | 55 |