Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;13(45):13611–13616. doi: 10.1039/d2sc05442f

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d2sc05442f-u1.jpg
Entry Variation Yield of 3/3ab (%)
1 None 66/8
2 H+ instead of Li+ 44/8
3 Na+ instead of Li+ 60/12
4 Li2CO3 instead of LiOMe/DTBP 48/20
5 KF instead of LiOMe/DTBP 38/40
6 2,6-Difluoropyridine instead of LiOMe/DTBP 22/36
7 Cu(OAc)2 instead of Cu(OTf)2 0/0
8 DCM instead of MeCN 0/0c
9 No DTBP 0/0
10 No LiOMe 58/8
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), 2 (2.5 equiv.), Cu(OTf)2 (2.5 equiv.), LiOMe (1.0 equiv.), 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (DTBP, 2.0 equiv.), MeCN (c = 25 mM), 18 h purple LEDs irradiation, 35 °C.

b

Yields were determined by 19F NMR using 2-fluorotoluene (2.0 equiv.) as an internal standard.

c

12% yield of protodecarboxylation product fluorobenzene was observed.