Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;2022(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3

Summary of findings 2. Subgroup analyses: early versus standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Early versus standard initiation of KRT in patients with AKI
Patient or population: AKI
Setting: intensive care unit
Intervention: early initiation
Comparison: standard initiation
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No. of participants (RCTs) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)
Risk with standard initiation Risk difference with early initiation
Death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes 383 per 1000 4 more per 1000
(23 fewer to 34 more) RR 1.01
(0.94 to 1.09) 4461 (9) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate 2
Death by AKI aetiology: surgical causes 408 per 1000 143 fewer per 1000
(282 fewer to 147 more) RR 0.65
(0.31 to 1.36) 365 (3) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 1 2
Kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous KRT 355 per 1000 149 more per 1000
(4 fewer to 365 more) RR 1.42
(0.99 to 2.03) 583 (6) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate2
Kidney recovery functionby KRT: continuous and intermittent KRT 520 per 1000 21 fewer per 1000
(47 fewer to 10 more) RR 0.96
(0.91 to 1.02) 4134 (4) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate 1
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; KRT: kidney replacement therapy
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Imprecision: due to the CI crossed the threshold for clinically meaningful effects

2 Inconsistency: due to heterogeneity