Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;2022(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3

Bouman 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Duration of study: May 1998 to March 2000

  • Duration of follow‐up: 28 days

Participants
  • Setting: multicentre (2 centres)

  • Country: The Netherlands

  • Patients with circulatory and respiratory insufficiency and early AKI who need CKRT; CrCl < 20 mL/min, and oliguria < 180 mL/6 hours despite fluid resuscitation; circulatory support and furosemide; early timing: < 12 hours inclusion; late timing: BUN > 40 mmol/L or severe pulmonary oedema

  • Number: intervention group 1 (35); intervention group 2 (35), control group (36)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): intervention group 1 (68 ± 13); intervention group 2 (70 ± 10); control group (67 ± 13)

  • Sex (M/F): intervention group 1 (21/14); intervention group 2 (20/15); control group (23/13)

  • Exclusion criteria: pre‐existing kidney disease with CrCl < 30 mL/min; AKI caused by permanent occlusion or surgical lesion of the renal artery; GN, interstitial nephritis, or vasculitis; postrenal obstruction; CHILD class C liver cirrhosis; AIDS with a CD4 count < 0.05 x 109/L; non‐witnessed arrest with Glasgow Coma Score < 5; haematological malignancy with neutrophils < 0.05 x 109/L; no haemofiltration machine free for use at time of inclusion arrest with Glasgow Coma Score < 5; haematological malignancy with neutrophils < 0.05 x 109/L; no haemofiltration machine free for use at time of inclusion

Interventions KRT modality
  • CVVHF

    • Haemofilter: cellulose triacetate hollow‐fibre

    • Replacement fluid: post‐dilution mode with bicarbonate solution

    • Anticoagulation: heparin or nadroparin


Intervention group 1
  • Early + high volume HF: intervention started within 12 hours after time of inclusion, and the UF flow rate was high (prescribed dose > 72 L/day and delivered dose 48.2 mL/kg/hours)


Intervention group 2
  • Early + low‐volume HF: intervention started within 12 hours after time of inclusion, and the UF flow rate was low (prescribed dose 24 to 36 L/day and 19 to 20 mL/kg/hour)


Control group
  • Late + low‐volume HF: intervention started when the patients fulfilled the conventional criteria for KRT

    • Urea level > 40 nmol/L, potassium > 6.5 mmol/L or severe pulmonary oedema, and the UF flow rate was 24 to 36 L/day and the delivered dose 19 to 20 mL/kg/hour


Co‐interventions
  • Not reported

Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Death at day 28

  • Recovery of kidney function


Secondary outcomes
  • ICU survival

  • Hospital survival

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

  • Length of ICU stay

  • Length of hospitalisation

Notes
  • Funding source: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Patients randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups using computer‐generated method
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Treatment assignments were kept in numbered, sealed opaque envelopes that were opened at the time of enrolment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement (for kidney recovery was unclear risk but for death was low risk)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk The outcome measurement is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Complete outcome data were reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The study reported death, kidney function recovery and adverse events
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement