Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;11(18):e025108. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025108

Table 3.

Prediction of Subtype (LQTS1 vs LQTS2)

Variable
Male patients (N=78) Female patients (N=111) P value
AUC Cutoff, ms Specificity Sensitivity PPV NPV AUC Cutoff, ms Specificity Sensitivity PPV NPV
Peak exercise QTc 0.71 435 0.53 0.80 0.46 0.74 0.72 460 0.63 0.76 0.65 0.80 0.82
1‐Min recovery QTc 0.70 435 0.44 0.76 0.80 0.39 0.82 455 0.91 0.75 0.95 0.49 0.15

Total N=189. Modeling adjusted for familial relatedness, and P values corrected for multiple comparisons. AUC indicates area under the curve; LQTS, long‐QT syndrome; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; and QTc, corrected QT interval.