Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;2022:2486979. doi: 10.1155/2022/2486979

Table 3.

GC-MS analysis of methanolic extract of M. speciosa stem.

No. Rt (min) Compound name Similarity MW Rc (%)
1 4.727 Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethyl- 91 296.075 1.126
2 7.041 Cyclopentasiloxane, decamethyl- 94 370.094 0.932
3 10.745 Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- 95 444.113 0.608
4 11.072 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol 90 150.068 0.815
5 15.811 Cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- 91 518.132 0.441
6 24.892 4-((1E)-3-Hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxyphenol 96 180.079 4.435
7 30.055 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 98 270.256 1.724
8 30.604 Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, methyl ester 90 292.204 0.769
9 31.264 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl 2-methylpropyl ester 96 278.152 3.566
10 31.772 n-Hexadecanoic acid 99 256.24 5.369
11 35.788 Phytol 91 296.308 0.923
12 47.128 1-Eicosene 91 280.313 0.923
13 57.864 Beta-sitosterol 98 414.386 6.298