Figure 3.
Spatial distribution of heterogeneous infiltrating immune cell subpopulations. (A) Pairwise comparison of the infiltration differences for TILs, CTLs, Teffs, Tregs and PDL1+ Tregs in the whole population between inner and stroma area. (B) Pairwise comparison of the infiltration differences for TILs, CTLs, Teffs, Tregs and PDL1+ Tregs within inner area between two groups. (C) Pairwise comparison of the infiltration differences for TILs, CTLs, Teffs, Tregs and PDL1+ Tregs in stroma area between two groups. (D) Schematic model for different scenarios of infiltration with the same number of immune cells locating within a 20 um radius of the tumor cell, reflecting distinct engagement level of immune cells. (E) Pairwise comparisons of the Gcross-AUC values for GTC : CTL, GTC : Treg, GTC : Teff, GTC : PDL1+Treg, GCTL : Treg and GCTL : PDL1+Treg between two groups. (F-H) Pairwise comparisons of the G-cross values at 20 um (F), 30 um (G) and 50 um (H) radii for GTC : CTL, GTC : Treg, GTC : Teff, GTC : PDL1+Treg, GCTL : Treg and GCTL : PDL1+Treg between two groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, not significant.
