Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;15(2):343–361. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01328-2

Table 4.

Summary of Results

Narratives, Knowledge, and Evidence Political Economy and Governance Capacity and Resources
Changes around Creating and Sustaining Momentum

Increased importance of nutrition in policies/strategies

Nutrition accepted as multisectoral issue

Advocacy increased and stimulated political attention to nutrition at all administrative levels

Nutrition data representative at state level became available and increased

Implementation of multisector interventions increased

Increased political attention for nutrition

Increased number of nutrition actors and sectors of nutrition interventions

More active multisectoral coordination platform and increased multisectoral dialogue at federal levels

Increased multisectoral collaboration at state/LGA levels

Increased accountability for nutrition change

Increased individual and organizational leadership and championing

Inauguration of National Council on Nutrition

Increased appointment of nutrition focal persons in non-health sectors

Challenges around Creating and Sustaining Momentum

Nutrition inadequately seen as a unique developmental challenge

Advocacy approaches are inadequate

Data quality limited, and some indicators have no data

Intervention coverage low compared to magnitude of need

Political attention still inadequate and is unequal across states and LGAs

Political attention may not be sustained from one political administration to another

Limited sharing of information across sectors

Duplication of coordination structures/roles

Limited accountability mechanisms

Institutional arrangements potentially limiting systemic capacity

Nutrition focal persons positioned at non-managerial levels in MDAs

Limited technical and soft skills among nutrition focal persons

Changes around Converting Momentum to Results Importance of implementation research now recognized

Increased adapting of national nutrition policies/strategies to address state peculiarities and priorities

Increased state to LGA coordination in some states

Increased civil society collaboration with public sector

Increased private sector attention to nutrition

Increased nutrition budgeting and resource allocation at federal, state, and LGA levels

Increased numbers of human resources for nutrition

Increased training of frontline workers across multiple sectors

Challenges around Converting Momentum to Results

Conduct of implementation research is limited

Impact pathways of policies/strategies are not explicit

Little use of data to estimate potential effect sizes and justify interventions included in policies/strategies

Inadequate communication and engagement among federal, state and LGA levels

Low involvement of state/LGA level actors in development of national policies/strategies

Limited understanding of national policies at state/ LGA levels leads to limited adaptations and ownership

Fragmented civil society actions

Inadequate private sector engagement and accountability

Limited budgetary releases and cash backing

Inadequate ability of nutrition actors to navigate funding bureaucratic processes

Heavy reliance on donors for funding

Funding focused on health sector and procurement of ready-to-use-therapeutic foods

Inadequate numbers and knowledge/skills of human resources

Inadequate work environments and logistics support

Limited use of operational plans where they exist

Stock out of commodities and tools

High population growth strains capacity and limits improvements

Physical insecurity limits service delivery and is increasing