Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;9(4):318–327. doi: 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1

Table 1.

Respondents’ characteristics†‡

Survey responses by OPTN regions % N = 174
  Region 1 2.9 5
  Region 2 11.5 20
  Region 3 9.2 16
  Region 4 6.9 12
  Region 5 9.2 16
  Region 6 4.0 7
  Region 7 6.9 12
  Region 8 4.0 7
  Region 9 5.7 10
  Region 10 7.5 13
  Region 11 8.6 15
  Not reported 23.6 41
Survey responses by type of living donor program % N = 174
  Kidney 70.1 122
  Kidney and Liver 23.0 40
  Liver 5.7 10
  Not reported 0.6 1
  Other 0.6 1
Number of responses per center % 174
  1 response(s) 41.4 72
  2 response(s) 10 18
  3 response(s) 0.6 1
  Center not reported 36.2 63
Uses electronic or online donor intake questionnaire % N = 174
  Yes 58.6 102
  No 41.4 72
Type of electronic tool % 102
  MedSleuth/Breeze 28.4 29
  Internal Form/System 22.6 23
  DASH/NKR 13.7 14
  One Medical Passport 11.8 12
  Other 19.6 20
  Not reported 3.9 4
Tracks potential living donor referral route % N = 174
  Yes 77.9 153
  No 12.1 21
Potential living donor referral route % N = 153
  Patient referral/directed donor 96.8 150
  Social network sites (i.e., Facebook, Instagram) 62.6 97
  Print media created by patient/families (i.e., flyers, billboards, posters, brochures) 53.5 83
  Broadcast media created by patient/families (i.e., radio, television) 43.9 68
  Media created by the living donor program 37.4 58
  Online membership sites 11.6 18
  Other 5.2 8
Change in potential living donor social media referrals in the last year % N = 100
  Increase 61 61
  Decrease 3 3
  Unchanged 9 9
  Don’t know/not reported 27 27

Selected questions include only those answering “yes” as the denominator

For “select all that apply” type questions, the number of responses may exceed the number of survey participants