Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;19(4):1057–1076. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z

Table 3.

Points acquired in the assessment of quality for each study according to the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale criteria

Study
Loneliness
Representativeness Selection Comparability
On the basis of design or analysis
Outcome Total
Non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Outcome of interest not present at start Assessment of outcome Follow-up long enough Adequacy of follow-up
Aguiar et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 7
Conde-Sala et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Drageset et al. (2012) 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 7
Ellwardt et al. 2015 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Elovainio et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Holwerda et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Holwerda et al. (2012) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
Hoogendijk et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Iecovich et al. (2011) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Julsing et al. (2016) 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
Jylha and Aro (1989) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Lara et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Luo and Waite (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Ng et al. (2021) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 7
Novak et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Olaya et al. (2017) 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Olsen et al. (1991) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
O’Suilleabhain et al. (2019) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 7
Perissinotto et al. (2012) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Schutter et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 8
Steptoe et al. (2013) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Stessman et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
Sugisawa et al. (1994) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Tabue Teguo et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 9
Tanskanen et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Tilvis et al. (2011) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Wang et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Youm et al. (2021) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 7
Networksize
Ali et al. (2018) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Cerhan and Wallace et al. (1997) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
DeBrito et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Ellwardt et al. 2015 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Giles et al. (2005) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
McLaughlin et al. (2011) 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
Roth (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8
Schutter et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 8
Shye et al. (1995) 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8
Vogt et al. (1992) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 8