Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;9:1012403. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1012403

Table 4.

Effect of mtDNA on heart failure using competing-risks regression model by a subdistribution hazard approach (fine and gray).

Univariate Adjusted a
Outcome: time to heart failure SHRb p -value 95% CI SHR p -value 95% CI
MtDNA (decrease, std)c 1.40 0.008 1.09; 1.80 1.32 0.03 1.03; 1.71
MtDNA quartilesd
Q3 vs. Q4 1.23 0.54 0.64; 2.34 1.04 0.91 0.54; 2.02
Q2 vs. Q4 1.56 0.16 0.84; 2.91 1.39 0.30 0.74; 2.61
Q1 vs. Q4 2.34 0.01 1.19; 4.58 1.88 0.07 0.96; 3.71
a

Adjusted for age, bmi, smoking, education, systolic, triglycerides and hdl.

b

Subdistributional hazard ratio where cancer, MI and death are considered competing events.

c

MtDNA has been reversed and standardized (HR for a one standard deviation decrease in mtDNA).

d

Q1 = 32.4–88, Q2 = 89–110, Q3 = 111–130, Q4 = 131–226.