Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;13:983199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983199

TABLE 3.

Conditional indirect effects analyses (LMX as mediator; perception of organizational politics [POP] as moderator).

Path/organizational politics level Effect SE LL95% UL95% p < 0.05
Abusive leadership → LMX → CWB(abusive leadership on CWB through LMX)
LOW (–1 SD) organizational politics 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.12 Yes
MEAN (0 SD) organizational politics 0.02 0.01 –0.02 0.04 No
HIGH (+ 1 SD) organizational politics –0.04 0.02 –0.02 –0.01 Yes
Abusive leadership → LMX → OCB(abusive leadership on OCB through LMX)
LOW (–1 SD) organizational politics –0.19 0.04 –0.29 –0.12 Yes
MEAN (0 SD) organizational politics –0.12 0.03 –0.18 –0.08 Yes
HIGH (+ 1 SD) organizational politics –0.06 0.02 –0.11 –0.03 Yes
Abusive leadership → LMX → turnover intentions(abusive leadership on TI through LMX)
LOW (–1 SD) organizational politics 0.38 0.08 0.20 0.51 Yes
MEAN (0 SD) organizational politics 0.25 0.05 0.16 0.36 Yes
HIGH (+ 1 SD) organizational politics 0.18 0.04 0.09 0.27 Yes

Bold facilitates readability. LMX, leader–member exchange; CWB, counterproductive work behaviors; OCB, organizational citizenship behaviors; TI, turnover intentions; Effect, indirect effect size estimator. The number 95% = confidence level. LL, lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI). UL, upper limit of 95% CI.