Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;12:996293. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.996293

Table 5.

Comparison of the prognostic performance of the TGTVndM and TNM staging systems.

Classification Subgroups Figure Linear trend χ2 Likelihood ratio χ2 AIC
N stage N0, N1, N2, N3 SA 5.06 11.68 1271.29
GTVnd stage GTVnd<4.35cm3
GTVnd≥4.35cm3
SB 16.23 18.48 1260.23
TNM stage I, II, III, IV SC 25.77 20.69 1260.06
TGTVndM stage I, II, III 3A 26.38 24.39 1255.07