Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;13:998612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998612

Table 4.

Sensory evaluation of different oil odor.

Essential oil odor Pleasantness Familiarity Subjective intensity Emotional arousal Emotional perception
Blended-I 1.24 ± 0.43c 2.86 ± 0.55b 4.69 ± 0.10ab 2.79 ± 0.36bc 0.41 ± 0.42bc
Blended-II 2.01 ± 0.42bc 2.76 ± 0.47b 4.35 ± 0.10c 2.35 ± 0.36c −0.17 ± 0.43c
Blended-III 1.15 ± 0.47c 2.54 ± 0.53b 4.72 ± 0.11ab 2.90 ± 0.35bc 0.56 ± 0.47bc
LVO 0.86 ± 0.44cd 1.71 ± 0.56b 4.75 ± 0.09ab 2.53 ± 0.45bc 0.29 ± 0.43bc
CSO 0.35 ± 0.50d 2.27 ± 0.54bc 4.80 ± 0.08a 3.07 ± 0.41b 0.79 ± 0.39b
BGO 1.84 ± 0.48bc 2.83 ± 0.51b 4.57 ± 0.10b 3.23 ± 0.34b 0.53 ± 0.45b
LMO 5.31 ± 0.43a 5.79 ± 0.46a 4.57 ± 0.10b 5.28 ± 0.37a 2.19 ± 0.54a
RMO 1.30 ± 0.47c 2.82 ± 0.55b 4.68 ± 0.11ab 3.20 ± 0.50b 1.03 ± 0.44ab
CPO 2.31 ± 0.39b 2.99 ± 0.55b 4.36 ± 0.09c 2.73 ± 0.37bc −0.09 ± 0.42c

Mean ratings (±standard error of the mean, n = 50) of different odors at three concentrations on pleasantness, familiarity, subjective intensity, emotional arousal, and emotional perception. Values followed by different or same lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) or no significant difference (p > 0.05) between groups. Data were analyzed by main effects analysis with two-way repeated ANOVAs, a post hoc Bonferroni test was used.