Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;11(11):2107. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112107

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Immunostaining analysis of TH in the SNpc and striatum of MPTP and NSE-hαSyn PD mouse models. (A,B) Immunostaining of TH in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and striatum of MPTP and NSE-hαSyn PD mouse models, respectively (n = 3 mice/group/model). (C,D) Immunofluorescence reactivity of TH in the SNpc and striatum of MPTP and NSE-hαSyn PD mouse models, respectively (n = 3 mice/group/model). The density values are relative to those of the control group and are expressed in arbitrary units (AU). Magnification 10x, scale bar = 50 µm. The values indicate the mean ± SEM. The significant differences have been given in the graphs. * Significant difference between the control and model group; # Significant difference between the model and cPS1P co-treated mouse. p < 0.05 was considered significant difference between the groups, as measured with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.