Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 12;12(22):3123. doi: 10.3390/ani12223123

Table 3.

Main effects of amaranth feeding, enzyme additionand interaction between amaranth feeding and enzyme addition on productive performance of laying hens.

Item FI 1
(g d−1 Bird−1)
HDP 2
(%)
EW 3
(g)
EM 4
(g d−1 Bird−1)
FCR 5
(kg Feed: kg Egg)
Amaranth Grain (AG), (g/kg)
0 109.17 81.80 60.56 a 49.54 a 2.20 b
100 109.08 82.25 59.80 a 49.20 a 2.21 b
200 109.13 82.36 59.64 a 49.13 a 2.22 b
300 108.11 80.13 58.24 b 46.68 b 2.33 a
400 108.97 79.12 58.49 b 46.29 b 2.35 a
SEM 0.131 0.277 0.319 0.352 0.016
p-value 0.85 0.47 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
p-value
Contrasts 0.49 0.01 0.001 0.001 0.001
Linear 0.37 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Quadratic 0.76 0.001 0.53 0.06 0.07
Enzyme (±E), (g/kg)
0 (−E) 109.18 80.13 58.90 b 47.20 b 2.31 a
0.25 (+E) 109.00 82.14 59.80 a 49.13 a 2.22 b
SEM 0.082 0.175 0.202 0.222 0.010
p-value 0.13 0.36 0.003 0.0001 0.0001
Interactions effect, (AG × E)
T1: 0 × 0 109.03 81.45 60.20 ab 49.04 bc 2.22 cd
T2: 100 × 0 109.37 80.58 59.56 b 48.00 cd 2.28 bc
T3: 200 × 0 109.38 80.13 59.24 bc 47.47 cd 2.30 b
T4: 300 × 0 109.13 79.68 57.49 d 45.81 e 2.38 a
T5: 400 × 0 109.01 78.79 57.99 cd 45.69 e 2.39 a
T6: 0 × 0.25 109.31 82.14 60.91 a 50.03 ab 2.18 de
T7: 100 × 0.25 108.78 83.92 60.05 ab 50.40 ab 2.15 de
T8: 200 × 0.25 109.22 84.59 60.04 ab 50.80 a 2.14 e
T9: 300 × 0.25 108.88 80.58 58.89 bc 47.54 cd 2.29 bc
T10: 400 × 0.25 108.93 79.46 58.99 bc 46.88 de 2.32 ab
SEM 0.185 0.392 0.452 0.497 0.023
p-value 0.15 0.64 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

a–e Means within each column with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). T1: 0 AG-E, T2: 100 AG-E, T3: 200 AG-E, T4: 300 AG-E, T5: 400 AG-E, T6: 0 AG + E, T7: 100 AG + E, T8: 200 AG + E, T9: 300 AG + E, T10: 400 AG + E; 1 FI: feed intake, 2 HDP: hen-day production, 3 EW: egg weight, 4 EM: egg mass, 5 FCR: feed conversion ratio.