Table 7.
Dietary pomelo peel powder affected the colonic microflora relative abundance at family level (%).
| Items | Treatments | Standard Error of the Mean | p Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | CTC | PPP | |||
| Prevotellaceae | 8.65 b | 24.47 a | 12.17 b | 2.79 | 0.048 |
| Veillonellaceae | 13.87 a | 17.95 a | 5.36 b | 2.14 | 0.013 |
| Lachnospiraceae | 14.58 | 15.87 | 12.81 | 1.32 | 0.676 |
| Ruminococcaceae | 12.15 b | 9.81 b | 16.50 a | 1.11 | 0.018 |
| BacteroidalesS24-7 | 10.06 | 6.38 | 9.60 | 0.75 | 0.095 |
| Clostridiales | 5.20 | 4.58 | 5.14 | 0.51 | 0.895 |
| Lactobacillaceae | 7.36 a | 1.57 b | 5.17 a | 0.91 | 0.018 |
| Paraprevotellaceae | 2.32 | 5.91 | 4.16 | 0.72 | 0.250 |
| Spirochaetaceae | 1.04 | 0.20 | 9.27 | 2.57 | 0.281 |
a, b different letter superscripts in the same row were marked on data for significant difference (p < 0.05).