Table 2.
Positive aspects | Negative aspects | Recommendations | |
---|---|---|---|
1. General feedback on the posters and videos | Peer-approach is great Videos and posters were both well accepted (2) Visualized information was seen as beneficial, particularly for illiterates (3) |
Use written media, such as newspapers, for distribution, as they are used as a source of information (3) Videos are more helpful because they are visually and aurally appealing (3) |
|
2. Where did PEH see the posters?a | Homeless facility (2) Homeless shelter Outpatient clinic Restroom Railway station |
Posters could be placed in - public transport - churches - public information boards |
|
3. Design of the vaccination posters | Participants liked the posters (7), because: • statements perceived as clear and visible (4) • variety of languages used • people feel addressed/can identify (5) Positive aspects on the choice of motifs: • underprivileged people are the protagonists • individual portraits (2) • variety of motifs (2) |
Motifs with PEH or urban motifs do not appeal to everyone because it can remind people of their own harsh realities (2) Excessive text Unsuited for illiterates (3) |
The following aspects could be considered in the posters: • also depict drug consumers • utilize city landmarks for identification (2) • portray more women • portray disabilities more obviously • use of one language per poster is clearer • show more positive motives, for example nature |
4. Use and benefits of the vaccination posters | Informative (5) Inspiration to think/speak about vaccination/COVID-19, but no influence on the decision to get vaccinated (3) |
Not useful Risk of going unnoticed |
|
5. Design of the videosb | The videos were appreciated (8) and perceived as: • concise (3) • easy to understand (5) People felt addressed (4) and could identify: • with the protagonists (2) • with the speaker (4) • with the diversity of protagonists • due to the realistic representation "It's the reality” |
Suggestions to improve the videos: • voice could be livelier • to depict individuals who take drugs • to provides Turkish and Arabic translation • key messages conveyed at the beginning of the videos |
|
6. Use and benefits of the videos | Perception of videos being an effective mean for health information distribution for those who possess a mobile phone (4) The information about the possibility of getting vaccinated even without health insurance and in case of drug use was perceived as particularly useful |
Distribution of flat rates to the PEH during the pandemic (7) | |
7. Other information/questions that came up during the interviews | Test site refused rapid antigen testing due to lack of identification Question if the isolation ward is still in place COVID-19 vaccination was well tolerated despite drug use |
The answers were structured in categories commenting on positive and negative aspects as well as recommendations. In the case of multiple mentions of a specific aspect, the number of mentions is given in brackets.
Three of the 8 participants had seen the posters before.
None of the participants had seen the videos before the interview.