Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 11;12(11):1003. doi: 10.3390/bios12111003

Table 7.

COVID-19 detection method comparisons.

Detection Method Sample Medium Average Specificity and/or Sensitivity Reference
RT-PCR Nasopharyngeal swab 98% sensitivity
100% specificity
[54]
Saliva 69% sensitivity
100% specificity
[54]
Antigen test Nasal swab 72.1% sensitivity
98.7% specificity
[55]
Nasopharyngeal 65.7% sensitivity
100% specificity
[56]
Canine screening Breath—
face masks
83.1% sensitivity
88.6% specificity
[57]
Face masks and clothes 86% sensitivity
92.9% specificity
[19]
Skin swab 92% sensitivity
91% specificity
[58]
Axillary sweat 97% sensitivity
91% specificity
[44]
Axillary sweat 89.6% sensitivity
83.9%specificity
[57]
Body odor—T-shirts
(including axillary sweat)
63% sensitivity
90% specificity
Current study
HS-SPME-GC-MS Body odor—T-shirts
(including axillary sweat)
100% sensitivity
100% specificity
Current study
SPME-GC-MS Blood serum 94% sensitivity
83% specificity
[59]
Quartz
microbalance
Blood serum 94% sensitivity
80% specificity
[59]
Colorimetric paper sensor Breath 78.3% sensitivity
83.6% specificity
[60]