Table 7.
COVID-19 detection method comparisons.
Detection Method | Sample Medium | Average Specificity and/or Sensitivity | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
RT-PCR | Nasopharyngeal swab | 98% sensitivity 100% specificity |
[54] |
Saliva | 69% sensitivity 100% specificity |
[54] | |
Antigen test | Nasal swab | 72.1% sensitivity 98.7% specificity |
[55] |
Nasopharyngeal | 65.7% sensitivity 100% specificity |
[56] | |
Canine screening | Breath— face masks |
83.1% sensitivity 88.6% specificity |
[57] |
Face masks and clothes | 86% sensitivity 92.9% specificity |
[19] | |
Skin swab | 92% sensitivity 91% specificity |
[58] | |
Axillary sweat | 97% sensitivity 91% specificity |
[44] | |
Axillary sweat | 89.6% sensitivity 83.9%specificity |
[57] | |
Body odor—T-shirts (including axillary sweat) |
63% sensitivity 90% specificity |
Current study | |
HS-SPME-GC-MS | Body odor—T-shirts (including axillary sweat) |
100% sensitivity 100% specificity |
Current study |
SPME-GC-MS | Blood serum | 94% sensitivity 83% specificity |
[59] |
Quartz microbalance |
Blood serum | 94% sensitivity 80% specificity |
[59] |
Colorimetric paper sensor | Breath | 78.3% sensitivity 83.6% specificity |
[60] |