Table 6.
Comparison of methodological properties of different detection methods.
| Method | Mycotoxin Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | LOQ | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methods based on QuEChERS | 10 | Quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe | Rely on high-precision instruments; mainly used for the analysis of pesticides; cumbersome preparation time. | 0.38~25 μg/kg | [26] |
| 8 | 1.0~200 μg/kg | [29] | |||
| Methods based on multi-antibody immunoaffinity | 12 | High specificity and selectivity, safe | Longer cleaning times and lower specificity; need for special process equipment; high cost of immunoaffinity columns; complex procedures involving degreasing or separate ESI+ and ESI- monitoring. | 0.3~118.7 μg/kg | [22] |
| 6 | 0.1~50 μg/kg | [30] | |||
| 5 | 0.1~1.0 μg/kg | [31] | |||
| SPE | 9 | Simple and inexpensive | Cumbersome and time-consuming to operate. | 0.03~2.12 μg/kg | [19] |
| 9 | 0.3~195.7 μg/kg | [32] | |||
| Multiple-impurity adsorption | 11 | Quick, easy, cheap, strong, effective, safe | / | 0.06~2.5 μg/kg | Methods in this paper |
/ None.