Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2019 Jun 19;84(13):8710–8716. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00824

Table 1.

Reaction Optimization and Influence of Bases on Reaction Outcomea

graphic file with name nihms-1850619-t0007.jpg

entry base temperature (°C) additives yield (%)b
  1 LiOt-Bu     26 (rt)   80c (86)
  2 NaOt-Bu     rt   44
  3 KOt-Bu     rt   20
  4 none     rt   0
  5 LiOt-Bu     40   76
  6 CS2CO3     rt   15
  7 K2CO3     rt   0
  8 LiOH·H2O     rt   19
  9 LiOAc     rt   0
  10 LiOMe     rt   41
  11 Et3N     rt   19
  12 pyridine     rt   0
  13d LiOt-Bu     rt air   22
  14e LiOt-Bu     rt light   78
  15f LiOt-Bu     rt   62
  16g LiOt-Bu     50 CH2Cl2   47
  17g LiOt-Bu     50 DCE   72
a

All reactions were performed using 1 mL of anhydrous, degassed, nonstabilized THF, 0.14 mmol of N-chlorophthalimide, and 0.14 mmol of LiOt-Bu under an argon atmosphere, with constant stirring in the dark, and at room temperature, unless stated otherwise.

b

NMR yield obtained using dibromomethane as an internal standard.

c

Isolated yield.

d

The reaction was performed in an open atmosphere.

e

The reaction was performed without covering the reactor in aluminum foil to allow ambient light in the reaction flask.

f

Stabilized reagent-grade THF was used without further purification and without degassing.

g

The reaction was performed using a 1:1 ratio of THF and the additive solvent (total volume 1 mL).