Table 5.

Summary of ROC analysis based on section-wise predicted RNFL thicknesses and localized mean over superior (S), nasal (N) inferior (I), temporal (T), superior plus inferior (S + I), and nasal plus temporal (N + T). * Refer to the highest sensitivity and ** to the second highest sensitivity for specificity at 80% among 12 subsections. † Refer to the best scored overall results.

Section	Area Under Curve	Sensitivity for Specificity at 95%	Sensitivity for Specificity at 80%	Sensitivity for Specificity at 86.9%	Threshold RNFL for Specificity at 95%	Threshold RNFL for Specificity at 80%	Threshold RNFL for Specificity at 86.9%
Global	0.861	34.5%	71.3	60.7	105.57	96.73	99.41
ST	0.779	17.6%	53.7%	41.2%	144.11	123.65	130.56
SS	0.765	8.6%	56.2%	37.1%	149.43	121.19	131.83
SN **	0.835	24.0%	70.6%	50.5%	125.85	105.22	112.96
NS	0.816	24.6%	62.9%	48.6%	108.95	92.12	97.58
NN	0.807	18.2%	63.3%	43.1%	87.23	72.65	77.27
NI	0.815	23.3%	66.1%	50.5%	100.66	84.20	89.56
IN	0.826	30.4%	70.0%	59.4%	122.32	106.19	110.97
II	0.830	19.8%	61.0%	40.3%	144.03	125.10	133.11
IT *	0.848	21.1%	88.2%	60.4%	129.52	101.24	112.08
TI	0.725	16.3%	49.2%	35.5%	89.20	79.97	83.57
TT	0.713	16.3%	43.8%	34.2%	86.08	79.60	81.77
TS	0.731	10.9%	49.2%	31.0%	103.68	88.41	93.26
S	0.862	29.7%	77.0%	60.7%	128.93	113.14	118.34
N	0.854	33.6%	73.5%	56.6%	92.94	81.79	86.37
I	0.899	36.4%	85.6%	71.9%	124.22	108.37	113.79
T	0.765	18.9%	54.3%	43.8%	89.59	81.23	83.60
S + I †	0.913	47.6%	90.7%	80.5%	122.07	108.73	113.02
N + T	0.868	32.6%	76.7%	60.7%	88.86	80.00	83.04