Table 1.
Details of ablation study and comparative analysis of the proposed framework with existing techniques. (*) represents the implementation of the methods is done by our team.
| Method | Backbone | Overall Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| DNC * + SVM [34] | Statistical patterns | 52.0 |
| TNC * + SVM [34] | Statistical patterns | 54.3 |
| TetraNC * + SVM [34] | Statistical patterns | 52.2 |
| CompositeNC * + SVM [34] | Statistical patterns | 57.3 |
| DeepBind [26] | Deep model | 61.3 |
| DeeperBind [26] | Deep model | 67.8 |
| Attention-CNN-LSTM | Deep model | 79.5 |
| Our CNN-LSTM | Deep model | 71.4 |
| Our CNN-GRU | Deep model | 71.1 |
| Our CNN-BDLSTM | Deep model | 74.8 |
| Our CNN-BDGRU | Deep model | 75.3 |
| Our proposed TCN | Deep model | 88.36 |