Table 4.
A: Comparison on overall performance of cavity preparation (scale range 5 to 15) (n = 138, Study 1). B: Re-coded comparison on overall performance of cavity preparation (scale range 5 to 15) (n = 138, Study 1).
| A | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores | Haptics (n = 47) | Phantom (n = 79) |
| 10 | 3 (6%) | 1 (1%) |
| 11 | 4 (9%) | 4 (5%) |
| 12 | 9 (19%) | 8 (10%) |
| 13 | 19 (40%) | 21 (27%) |
| 14 | 8 (17%) | 35 (44%) |
| 15 | 4 (9%) | 10 (13%) |
| Mean | 13.46 | 12.79 |
| chi2 = 13.42 | (p = 0.02) | |
| B | ||
| Score | Haptic | Phantom |
| <=13 | 35 (74%) | 34 (43%) |
| >=14 | 12 (26%) | 45 (57%) |
| Fisher Exact Test (p = 0.0) | ||