Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15194. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215194

Table 2.

Summary of Main Results of Included Studies.

Author and Year Type of Special Patient Study Type Sample
and
Groups
Gender
and Relation with Caries
Age (Mean Age)
and Relation with DMFT
Caries Evaluation DMFT
and
Decayed Teeth
Caries Prevalence More Caries than HP
Agarwal et al., 2021 [24] Schizophrenia CS 111 M: 74.4%
F: 25.3%
N.I.
34.73 y
DMFT increase with age
OE M: 3.0
F: 3.1
All: 3.09
Decayed
N.I.
N.I. N.I.
Arora et al., 2019 [27] Drug addicts Case-
Control
Case: 100
Control: 100
Case: 100 male
Control: 100 male
N.I.
Case: 30.8 y
Control: 29.8 y
N.I.
OE Case: 5.71
Control 2.45
Decayed
N.I.
N.I. Yes
Blomqvist et al., 2015 [31] Autism spectrum disorder CS Autism: 47
Control: 69
M: 53.2%
F: 46.8%
N.I.
33 y
N.I.
OE, RE Autism: 14.9
Control: 15.9
Decayed:
Autism: 4.9
Control: 10.3
N.I. No
Cao et al., 2018 [28] Adult heart transplant (AHT) CS AHT:
81
Control: 63
AHT
M: 69.1%
F: 30.9%
Control
M: 63.5%
F: 36.5%
N.I.
AHT: 47.7
Control: 49.6
N.I.
OE AHT: 3
Control: 3
AHT: 80.2%
Control: 79.4%
No
Diab et al., 2017 [15] Intellectual disabilities CS Case: 510
Survey: 1877
N.I. Age brackets from 12 to 44
DMFT increase with age
ID: OE
Survey: SR
12 y: 4.27
15 y: 4.80
35–44 y: 12.71
Decayed:
ID
12: 3.90
15: 4.01
35–44: 3.17
Survey:
12: 5.14
15: 6.80
35–44: 7.20
N.I. No
Fernandez et al., 2016 [14] Intellectual disabilities CS Poland: 1549
Romania: 1683
Slovenia: 293
Poland:
M: 69%
F: 31%
Romania:
M: 60%
F: 40%
Slovenia:
M: 64%
F: 36%
N.I.
Poland: 23.2 y
Romania 22.9 y
Slovenia 27.8 y
N.I.
OE N.I. Poland: 41%
Romania: 19%
Slovenia 61%
N.I.
Goud et al., 2021 [32] Psychiatric patients CS 150 M: 60%
F: 40%
33.79 y
N.I.
OE 4.06
Decayed:
3.4
87.3% N.I.
Kapellas et al., 2021 [29] Kidney disease CS Case: 102
Control: 312 Survey: 4775
Case
M: 39.2%
F: 60.8%
Control
M: 55.8%
F: 44.2%
Survey:
M: 49.7%
F: 50.3%
N.I.
Case: 48.1
Control: 40.01
Survey: 44.84
N.I.
Case and control: OE
Survey:
SR
Case: 0.86
Control: 9.72
Survey: 14.01
Decayed
Case: 3.17
Control: 3.02
Survey: 0.59
N.I. No
Liberali et al., 2013 [21] HIV CS 92–93:
54
9–10:
60
92–93
M: 90.7%
F: 9.3%
9–10
M: 96.7%
F: 3.3%
N.I.
92–93
Age brackets from 25 to 50+
9–10
Age brackets from 25 to 50+
N.I.
OE
RE
92–93:
15.6
9–10:
8.7
AM: 15.3
Decayed
1992: 2.4
2009: 0.6
AM: 0.6
92–93:
51.9%
9–10: 35%
Control:
24.2%
No
Lima et al., 2019 [30] Diabetic CS Diabetics from Fortaleza: 60
Diabetics from Rouen: 60
FOR:
M: 50%
F: 50%
Rouen:
M: 50%
F: 50%
N.I.
Fortaleza
Age brackets from 25 to 85+
Rouen:
Age brackets from 25 to 85+
N.I.
OE Fortaleza
27.1
Rouen:
25.8
Decayed
Fortaleza
0.5
Rouen
1.7
FOR
50%
Rouen
38.9%
N.I.
Ningrum et al., 2020 [16] Intellectual disability CS 65 M: 48%
F: 52%
Male
22 y
N.I.
OE N.I.
Decayed
F: 3.00
M: 7.55
N.I. N.I.
Oliveira et al., 2013 [17] Intellectual disability CS ID: 103
Siblings: 103
ID: M: 60%
F: 40%
Siblings
M: 40%
F: 60%
N.I.
Age brackets from 12 to 36
N.I.
OE ID: 6.36
Siblings: 5.06
Decayed:
ID: 3.52
Siblings: 2.03
ID: 55.3%
Siblings: 40.1%
Yes
Petrovic et al., 2016 [18] Intellectual disability CS 726 M: 62.75%
F: 37.25%
  • No differences between gender

Age bracets from 12 to 20+
No differences between age
OE 12–20: 3.89
+20: 4.83
M: 4.73
F: 3.90
Decayed:
4.37
N.I. N.I.
Pini et al., 2016 [1] Down syndrome
Cerebral palsy
Intellectual disability
CS DS: 17
CP: 13
ID: 17
DS
M: 41%
F: 59%
CP
M: 69%
F: 31%
ID
M: 59%
F: 41%
N.I.
Age brackets from 12 to 55
N.I.
OE DS: <10:47%
>10: 52%
CP: <10: 69%
>10: 30%
ID: <10 53%
>10: 47%
Decayed:
N.I.
N.I. N.I.
Porovic et al., 2016 [13] Down syndrome CS 33 M: 63.6%
F: 36.4%
N.I.
From 19 to 45
N.I.
OE 15.96
Decayed:
3.57
N.I. N.I.
Rezaei-Soufi et al., 2014 [22] HIV CS HIV T
50
HIV WT
50
Treatment
M: 71.4%
F: 28.6%
Control
M: 81.8%
F: 18.2%
N.I.
Case: 36 y
Control: 38 y
N.I.
OE Case:
15.14
Control: 14.45
Decayed
Case: 6.86
Control: 5.36
Treatment: 34.52%
Control: 27.42%
N.I.
Rungsiyanont et al., 2012 [23] HIV CS 299 M: 28.6%
F: 71%
N.I.
36.7 y
N.I.
SR N.I. 65.9% N.I.
Schmidt et al., 2021 [19] Intellectual disability CS 132 M: 49.2%
F: 51.8%
No differences between gender
35.2 y
DMFT increased with age
OE All: 9.5
M:9.9
F: 9.2
Decayed
All: 0.5
M: 0.5
F: 0.6
All: 89.4%
M: 87.1%
F: 91%
N.I.
Schulte et al., 2013 [20] Intellectual disability CS 428 M: 51.4%
F: 48.6%
No differences between gender
All: 35.5 y
M: 36.7 y
F: 34.3 y
DMFT increased with age
OE All:12.25
M: 12.42
F: 12.09
Decayed
M: 2.14
F: 1.83
All: 95.5%
Caries free: 4.4%
M: 95.7%
F: 95.4%
N.I.
Wey et al., 2016 [25] Schizophrenia CS Case: 543
Survey: 8332
M: 66.7%
F: 33.3%
N.I.
54.8 y
DMFT increased with age
Case: OE
Survey: SR
Case: 20.5
Survey: 11.6
Decayed Case: 3.48
Survey: 1.70
Case: 82.2%
Survey: 89.3%
No
Zaliunienne et al., 2014 [26] Haemophilia Case-Control Case: 75
Control: 72
M: 100%
N.I.
Age bracets from 11 to 60
N.I.
OE, RE Case: 9.4
Control: 9.3
Decayed:
Case: 3.1
Control: 2.7
N.I. No

HIV T: HIV with treatment; HIV WT: HIV without treatment; M: male; F: female; HP: healthy patient; N.I: no information; OE: oral exploration; SR: self-reported; RE: radiograph exploration; AM: aged matched; DMFT: decayed, missing, and filled teeth; DS: down syndrome; CP: cerebral palsy; ID: intellectual disability.