Table 2.
A cross-ranking analysis between Nutri-Score and Warning Stamps.
| Nutri Score |
FoP 0 |
FoP 1 |
FoP 2 |
FoP 3 |
FoP 4 |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 187 (94.9%) |
8 (4.0%) |
1 (0.5%) |
1 (0.5%) |
0 (0%) |
197 |
| B | 101 (85.5%) |
12 (10.1%) |
4 (3.3%) |
1 (0.8%) |
0 (0%) |
118 |
| C | 82 (63.5%) |
21 (16.2%) |
17 (13.1%) |
9 (6.9%) |
0 (0%) |
129 |
| D | 39 (23.6%) |
28 (16.9%) |
36 (21.8%) |
62 (37.5%) |
0 (0%) |
165 |
| E | 12 (9.4%) |
4 (3.1%) |
9 (7%) |
98 (77.1%) |
4 (3.1%) |
127 |
| Total | 421 | 73 | 67 | 171 | 4 | 736 |
In this table, a cross-analysis of the two classifications is carried out. In the rows, the foods categorised by Nutri-Score are shown, and those were distributed by each FoP warning labels category, in order to establish concordance or discordance according to their recommendation parameters according to the nutritional quality established by their guidelines.