Table 3.
A cross-ranking analysis between NOVA and FoP Warning Labels.
| NOVA | FoP 0 |
FoP1 | FoP 2 |
FoP 3 |
FoP 4 |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 143 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
143 |
| 2 | 69 (77.5%) |
0 (0%) |
12 (13.4%) |
8 (8.9%) |
0 (0%) |
89 |
| 3 | 78 (71.5%) |
18 (16.5%) |
4 (3.6%) |
9 (8.2%) |
0 (0%) |
109 |
| 4 | 131 (33.2%) |
55 (13.9%) |
51 (12.9%) |
154 (38.9%) |
4 (1.0%) |
395 |
| Total | 421 | 73 | 67 | 171 | 4 | 736 |
In this table, a cross-analysis of the two classifications is carried out. In the rows, the foods categorised by NOVA are shown, and those were distributed by each FoP warning category, in order to establish concordance or discordance according to their recommendation parameters according to the nutritional quality established by their guidelines.