Two kinetic schemes (Scheme 1 and 2) were considered for modeling the kinetics of IHM formation. In Scheme 1, we assumed the initial ATP-binding step (K
T) was followed by transition into the IHM (K
IHM) which was then detected by FRET. The model postulates that heavy meromyosin (HMM) can populate two conformations in the absence of nucleotide (Apo), one that is in the Open conformation and another in an Alternate (ALT) conformation. The top pathway (Fast Phase-green) represents ATP binding to the Open state followed by a favorable transition into the IHM in low salt. The lower pathway (Slow Phase-yellow) is only significantly populated at low salt and characterized by slower ATP binding to the ALT conformation and a favorable transition into the IHM. In Scheme 2, the slow phase is caused by a conformation that is incompetent to bind nucleotide (INC) and in equilibrium with the Open conformation. In both models, in the absence of nucleotide (Apo) in low-salt conditions, the E525K mutant favors the ALT or INC conformation, while WT favors the open conformation. Also, both models predict that in high-salt conditions, the rate of transition into the IHM slows for both WT and mutant, and it is unfavorable for WT but E525K still favors the IHM. Rate constants for WT are in black and E525K in red (see
Table 4 for summary of rate constants).