Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 13;5(1):100605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100605

Table 2.

Histological comparison between cases of predominantly lobular or portal hepatitis.

Lobular hepatitis
Portal hepatitis
p value
(n = 45) (n = 10)
Interface hepatitis
 0-1 23 (51%) 2 (20%) 0.041
 2 13 (29%) 4 (40%)
 3 9 (20%) 2 (20%)
 4 0 2 (20%)
Confluent necrosis
 0 7 (16%) 7 (70%) 0.009
 1-2 12 (26%) 2 (20%)
 3-4 17 (38%) 1 (10%)
 5-6 9 (20%) 0
Lobular necroinflammation
 0-1 2 (4%) 2 (20%) 0.004
 2 13 (29%) 6 (60%)
 3 16 (36%) 2 (20%)
 4 14 (31%) 0
Portal inflammation
 0-1 13 (29%) 0 0.005
 2 26 (58%) 5 (50%)
 3 6 (13%) 5 (50%)
 4 0 0
Fibrosis
 0 6 (13%) 0 0.006
 1-2 36 (80%) 6 (60%)
 3-4 3 (7%) 3 (30%)
 5-6 0 1 (10%)
Inflammatory cells
 Plasma cell aggregate 28 (62%) 8 (80%) 0.285
 Eosinophil aggregate 18 (40%) 5 (50%) 0.562
Histological criteria
 Likely 32 (71%) 8 (80%) 0.572
 Possible 13 (29%) 2 (20%)
 Unlikely 0 0

Histological parameters were compared between cases of lobular and portal hepatitis using the Mann-Whitney U test. A probability of p <0.05 was considered to be significant.