Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2022 Aug 19;163(6):1582–1592.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.034

Table 2.

Performance Characteristics of HR-ARM Findings vs Abnormal BET in Constipated Patients (n=474)

Anorectal variable Abnormal BET results, No. (%) Sensitivity, % Specificity, % Positive predictive value, % Negative predictive value, % AUROC, %
High anal resting pressure 18/34 (53) 12 95 53 70 53
Reduced anal squeeze increment 43/108 (40) 28 80 40 70 54
Evacuation
   Reduced rectal pressure increase 16/37 (43) 11 94 43 69 52
   High residual anal pressure 26/54 (48) 17 91 48 70 54
   Reduced anal relaxation 31/71 (44) 20 88 44 70 54
   Reduced rectoanal gradient 54/101 (53) 36 85 53 74 60
   Increased rectal sensory threshold for urgency 20/39 (51) 13 94 51 69 54
Number of abnormal variables threshold 65a
   1 52/155 (34) 72 50 41 79
   2 27/64 (42) 37 83 51 73
   3 17/32 (53) 19 95 64 71
   4 9/9 (100) 7 99.7 92 69
   5 1/1 (100) 1 100.0 100 68
   6 1/1 (100) 1 100.0 100 68

Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating curve; BET, balloon expulsion time; HR-ARM, high-resolution anal manometry; N/A, not applicable.

a

The AUROC was calculated for a model that included a threshold of 1 or more abnormal variables. Fifteen patients with missing data for sensation were excluded from the sensitivity and specificity analysis for the total number of abnormal variables.